Literature DB >> 14576547

Evaluation of rapid ischemic preconditioning in a rabbit model of spinal cord ischemia.

Meiko Kakimoto1, Masahiko Kawaguchi, Takanori Sakamoto, Satoki Inoue, Hitoshi Furuya, Mitsutoshi Nakamura, Noboru Konishi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been shown to reduce cellular injury after subsequent cardiac and cerebral ischemia. However, the data on rapid IPC of the spinal cord is limited. The authors investigated whether pretreatment with sublethal ischemia of spinal cord can attenuate neuronal injury after spinal cord ischemia in rabbits.
METHODS: Forty-seven male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 15 or 16 each). In the IPC(-) group, the infrarenal aorta was occluded for 17 min to produce spinal cord ischemia. In the IPC(+) group, 5 min of aortic occlusion was performed 30 min before 17 min of spinal cord ischemia. In the sham group, the aorta was not occluded. Hind limb motor function was assessed at 3 h, 24 h, 4 days, and 7 days after reperfusion using Tarlov scoring (0 = paraplegia; 4 = normal). Animals were killed for histopathologic evaluation at 24 h or 7 days after reperfusion. The number of normal neurons in the anterior spinal cord (L4-L6) was counted.
RESULTS: Neurologic scores were significantly higher in the IPC(+) group than the IPC(-) group at 3 and 24 h after reperfusion (P < 0.05). However, neurologic scores in the IPC(+) group gradually decreased and became similar to those in the IPC(-) group at 4 and 7 days after reperfusion. At 24 h after reperfusion, the numbers of normal neurons were significantly higher in the IPC (+) group than in the IPC(-) group (P < 0.05) and were similar between the IPC(+) and sham groups. At 7 days after reperfusion, there was no difference in the number of normal neurons between the IPC(+) and IPC(-) groups.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that rapid IPC protects the spinal cord against neuronal damage 24 h but not 7 days after reperfusion in a rabbit model of spinal cord ischemia, suggesting that the efficacy of rapid IPC may be transient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14576547     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  13 in total

1.  Postconditioning, a series of brief interruptions of early reperfusion, prevents neurologic injury after spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Xiaojing Jiang; Enyi Shi; Yoshiki Nakajima; Shigehito Sato
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Evidence for a role of second pathophysiological stress in prevention of delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA1 region.

Authors:  Jozef Burda; Milina Matiasová; Miroslav Gottlieb; Viera Danielisová; Miroslava Némethová; Lidia Garcia; Matilde Salinas; Rastislav Burda
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  The Protective Effects of Ischemic Postconditioning against Stroke: From Rapid to Delayed and Remote Postconditioning.

Authors:  Heng Zhao
Journal:  Open Drug Discov J       Date:  2011-12-24

Review 4.  From rapid to delayed and remote postconditioning: the evolving concept of ischemic postconditioning in brain ischemia.

Authors:  Heng Zhao; Chuancheng Ren; Xingmiao Chen; Jiangang Shen
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.465

5.  Comparison of the protective effects of direct ischemic preconditioning and remote ischemic preconditioning in a rabbit model of transient spinal cord ischemia.

Authors:  Takehiko Fukui; Kazuyoshi Ishida; Yoichi Mizukami; Kiyotaka Shiramoto; Hidenori Harada; Atsuo Yamashita; Satoshi Yamashita; Mishiya Matsumoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Delayed postconditionig initiates additive mechanism necessary for survival of selectively vulnerable neurons after transient ischemia in rat brain.

Authors:  Jozef Burda; Viera Danielisová; Miroslava Némethová; Miroslav Gottlieb; Milina Matiasová; Iveta Domoráková; Eva Mechírová; Marianna Feriková; Matilde Salinas; Rastislav Burda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Effect of noradrenalin and EGb 761 pretreatment on the ischemia-reperfusion injured spinal cord neurons in rabbits.

Authors:  Eva Mechírová; Iveta Domoráková; Marianna Danková; Viera Danielisová; Jozef Burda
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.046

8.  Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning.

Authors:  C Ren; X Gao; G K Steinberg; H Zhao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Limb remote ischemic postconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats.

Authors:  Chuancheng Ren; Zhimin Yan; Dingtai Wei; Xuwen Gao; Xiaoyuan Chen; Heng Zhao
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Ischemic preconditioning protects against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits by attenuating blood spinal cord barrier disruption.

Authors:  Bo Fang; Xiao-Man Li; Xi-Jia Sun; Na-Ren Bao; Xiao-Yan Ren; Huang-Wei Lv; Hong Ma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.