Literature DB >> 14575645

T cell receptor transgenic mice provide novel insights into understanding cellular targets of TCDD: suppression of antibody production, but not the response of CD8(+) T cells, during infection with influenza virus.

Kristen A Mitchell1, B Paige Lawrence.   

Abstract

Although exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) clearly impairs T cell-dependent immune responses, the mechanisms underlying TCDD-induced T cell dysfunction are unclear. With the goal of determining precisely how exposure to TCDD impairs the activation of CD8(+) T cells in vivo, we used a well-defined T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic system. Greater than 95% of the CD8(+) T cells in F5 transgenic mice possess TCR specific for a peptide from influenza A virus expressed in the context of H-2D(b). Unexpectedly, we discovered that exposure to TCDD did not alter CD8(+) T cell function in the transgenic mice. Specifically, treatment of F5 mice with TCDD did not affect the recruitment of virus-specific CD8(+) T cells to the lung, nor did it impair the ability of CD8(+) T cells in the lymph node to produce cytokines, or to clonally expand or differentiate. This is in direct contrast to the suppressive effects of TCDD on the response of CD8(+) T cells in wild-type mice. Exposure of F5 mice to TCDD induced CYP1A1 and suppressed the production of virus-specific antibodies. Likewise, upon adoptive transfer into wild-type mice, TCDD suppressed the expansion and differentiation of F5-derived CD8(+) T cells. This indicates that the F5 mice and lymphocytes derived from them are not inherently resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of TCDD. Rather, our data suggest that in the context of a supraphysiological number of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells, the function of these cells was not affected by exposure to TCDD. Given that antibody production in the F5 mice was sensitive to suppression by TCDD, while the CD8 response was resistant, our data provide a new perspective on the ways in which exposure to TCDD adversely affects B and T lymphocyte function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575645     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00297-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  5 in total

1.  Virally activated CD8 T cells home to Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced granulomas but enhance antimycobacterial protection only in immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  Laura H Hogan; Dominic O Co; Jozsef Karman; Erika Heninger; M Suresh; Matyas Sandor
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Novel cellular targets of AhR underlie alterations in neutrophilic inflammation and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression during influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Jennifer L Head Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Environmental exposures are hidden modifiers of anti-viral immunity.

Authors:  Anthony M Franchini; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 4.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a modulator of anti-viral immunity.

Authors:  Jennifer L Head; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 5.  TCR Transgenic Mice: A Valuable Tool for Studying Viral Immunopathogenesis Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yong-Bin Cho; In-Gu Lee; Yong-Hyun Joo; So-Hee Hong; Young-Jin Seo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.