David Schwartzman1, Raveen Bazaz, John Nosbisch. 1. Atrial Arrhythmia Center, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Presbyterian, B535, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA. schwartzmand@upmc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is a rapidly evolving art. There is currently no consensus as to optimal methodology. We report a sequential experience, during which three distinct ablation techniques were utilized. METHODS: A cohort of 112 patients in whom atrial fibrillation onset was precipitated by ectopy arising solely from myocardium investing the pulmonary veins underwent catheter ablation using one of three techniques: focal (Group A); individual vein encircling (Group B); vestibule encircling (Group C). In each group, non-fluoroscopic guidance of the mapping and ablation process was provided by the tandem use of CARTO and intracardiac echocardiography. RESULTS: In all groups, endocardial topography was complex, and ablation electrode-endocardial contact was often unstable. Maximal electrode temperatures were low, despite frequent echocardiographic evidence of myocardial boiling. A significant progression in the number of radiofrequency energy applications between groups A and C was observed. Although acute suppression of atrial fibrillation inducibility was observed uniformly, chronic suppression rates were significantly different: Group A = 47%; Group B; 69%; Group C = 87%. CONCLUSIONS: In this non-concurrent cohort, the rate of chronic suppression of atrial fibrillation correlated with the amount of myocardium ablated or electrically isolated. Prospective data will be required to further evaluate whether "more is better."
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is a rapidly evolving art. There is currently no consensus as to optimal methodology. We report a sequential experience, during which three distinct ablation techniques were utilized. METHODS: A cohort of 112 patients in whom atrial fibrillation onset was precipitated by ectopy arising solely from myocardium investing the pulmonary veins underwent catheter ablation using one of three techniques: focal (Group A); individual vein encircling (Group B); vestibule encircling (Group C). In each group, non-fluoroscopic guidance of the mapping and ablation process was provided by the tandem use of CARTO and intracardiac echocardiography. RESULTS: In all groups, endocardial topography was complex, and ablation electrode-endocardial contact was often unstable. Maximal electrode temperatures were low, despite frequent echocardiographic evidence of myocardial boiling. A significant progression in the number of radiofrequency energy applications between groups A and C was observed. Although acute suppression of atrial fibrillation inducibility was observed uniformly, chronic suppression rates were significantly different: Group A = 47%; Group B; 69%; Group C = 87%. CONCLUSIONS: In this non-concurrent cohort, the rate of chronic suppression of atrial fibrillation correlated with the amount of myocardium ablated or electrically isolated. Prospective data will be required to further evaluate whether "more is better."
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; S Garrigue; A Takahashi; T Lavergne; M Hocini; J T Peng; R Roudaut; J Clémenty Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nassir F Marrouche; Thomas Dresing; Christopher Cole; Dianna Bash; Eduardo Saad; Krzysztof Balaban; Stephen V Pavia; Robert Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Ahmed Abdul-Karim; Ennio Pisano; Raffaele Fanelli; Patrick Tchou; Andrea Natale Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-08-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Joan M Lacomis; Karen Pealer; Carl R Fuhrman; Dale Barley; William Wigginton; David Schwartzman Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Jason Confino; Daniel Edmundowicz; Joan M Lacomis; Iclal Ocak; Christopher R Deible; David Schwartzman Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2008-12-01