BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV's) is crucial to achieve success in catheter ablation for trigger elimination in focal atrial fibrillation (AF). To guide ostial PV radiofrequency (RF) delivery, it is necessary to identify the electrical breakthrough (EBT) between PV and left atrium. For this purpose, coronary sinus (CS) fixed rate pacing is commonly used. This study evaluated, whether CS extrastimulus pacing is superior in identifying the EBT area as compared to fixed rate pacing. METHODS: In 9 patients (51 +/- 10 years) undergoing a left sided electrophysiological study for AF ablation, 25 PV's (10 right and 15 left-sided PV's) were mapped using a 4 French fixed-wire catheter with eight 6 mm coiled Platinum electrodes in a distal looped configuration (Revelation Helix, Cardima Inc.). For mapping and ablation the electrode loop was positioned in the PV ostium rectangular to the longitudinal PV axis. EBT area was identified as those electrodes indicating the earliest PV signals during CS pacing. We measured number of EBT electrodes and time between EBT and the latest activated bipoles at the electrode loop during fixed rate and extrastimulus pacing. The reduction of two or more EBT electrodes was defined as a significant benefit in EBT identification. RESULTS: In 22 of 25 PV's mapped PV potentials could be observed. Performing fixed rate pacing the EBT area was identified in a mean of 4.2 +/- 1 electrodes, whereas using extrastimulus pacing, EBT area could be significantly reduced to 2.3 +/- 0.8 electrodes. The time between EBT and latest electrode activated increased from 14 +/- 7 ms to 22 +/- 10 ms indicating an intrapulmonary conduction delay during extrastimulus pacing. In 13 of 22 PV's mapped (59%), extrastimulus pacing was beneficial in the identification of the EBT, as the primary target for RF delivery. CONCLUSIONS: CS extrastimulus pacing induces intra-PV decremental conduction properties allowing one to identify a more localised and smaller EBT area as the primary target for RF delivery. Performing PV ablation to treat focal AF, extrastimulus maneuvers allow to unmask the "true" EBT and thus may help to limit intrapulmonary RF delivery.
BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV's) is crucial to achieve success in catheter ablation for trigger elimination in focal atrial fibrillation (AF). To guide ostial PV radiofrequency (RF) delivery, it is necessary to identify the electrical breakthrough (EBT) between PV and left atrium. For this purpose, coronary sinus (CS) fixed rate pacing is commonly used. This study evaluated, whether CS extrastimulus pacing is superior in identifying the EBT area as compared to fixed rate pacing. METHODS: In 9 patients (51 +/- 10 years) undergoing a left sided electrophysiological study for AF ablation, 25 PV's (10 right and 15 left-sided PV's) were mapped using a 4 French fixed-wire catheter with eight 6 mm coiled Platinum electrodes in a distal looped configuration (Revelation Helix, Cardima Inc.). For mapping and ablation the electrode loop was positioned in the PV ostium rectangular to the longitudinal PV axis. EBT area was identified as those electrodes indicating the earliest PV signals during CS pacing. We measured number of EBT electrodes and time between EBT and the latest activated bipoles at the electrode loop during fixed rate and extrastimulus pacing. The reduction of two or more EBT electrodes was defined as a significant benefit in EBT identification. RESULTS: In 22 of 25 PV's mapped PV potentials could be observed. Performing fixed rate pacing the EBT area was identified in a mean of 4.2 +/- 1 electrodes, whereas using extrastimulus pacing, EBT area could be significantly reduced to 2.3 +/- 0.8 electrodes. The time between EBT and latest electrode activated increased from 14 +/- 7 ms to 22 +/- 10 ms indicating an intrapulmonary conduction delay during extrastimulus pacing. In 13 of 22 PV's mapped (59%), extrastimulus pacing was beneficial in the identification of the EBT, as the primary target for RF delivery. CONCLUSIONS: CS extrastimulus pacing induces intra-PV decremental conduction properties allowing one to identify a more localised and smaller EBT area as the primary target for RF delivery. Performing PV ablation to treat focal AF, extrastimulus maneuvers allow to unmask the "true" EBT and thus may help to limit intrapulmonary RF delivery.
Authors: M Hocini; D C Shah; P Jaïs; M Haïssaguerre; J T Peng; T Yamane; I Deisenhofer; S Garrigue; J Clémenty Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: W C Yu; T L Hsu; C T Tai; C F Tsai; M H Hsieh; W S Lin; Y K Lin; H M Tsao; Y A Ding; M S Chang; S A Chen Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2001-08
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; D C Shah; P Jaïs; M Hocini; T Yamane; I Deisenhofer; M Chauvin; S Garrigue; J Clémenty Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-11-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245