Literature DB >> 14574026

Clinical trials in pacing for bradyarrhythmias.

Richard Sutton1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14574026     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026224121547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators.

Authors:  S J Connolly; C R Kerr; M Gent; R S Roberts; S Yusuf; A M Gillis; M H Sami; M Talajic; A S Tang; G J Klein; C Lau; D M Newman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation).

Authors:  L S Dreifus; C Fisch; J C Griffin; P C Gillette; J W Mason; V Parsonnet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-08

4.  Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing.

Authors:  E J Perrins; C A Morley; S L Chan; R Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-08

5.  Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators.

Authors:  G A Lamas; E J Orav; B S Stambler; K A Ellenbogen; E B Sgarbossa; S K Huang; R A Marinchak; N A Estes; G F Mitchell; E H Lieberman; C M Mangione; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.

Authors:  H R Andersen; J C Nielsen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; P T Mortensen; T Vesterlund; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome.

Authors:  H R Andersen; L Thuesen; J P Bagger; T Vesterlund; P E Thomsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction.

Authors:  Gervasio A Lamas; Kerry L Lee; Michael O Sweeney; Russell Silverman; Angel Leon; Raymond Yee; Roger A Marinchak; Greg Flaker; Eleanor Schron; E John Orav; Anne S Hellkamp; Stephen Greer; John McAnulty; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Frederick Ehlert; Roger A Freedman; N A Mark Estes; Arnold Greenspon; Lee Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.