Literature DB >> 14572746

Intermittent maximal androgen blockade in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: an EORTC feasibility study.

Walter Albrecht1, Laurence Collette, Cesare Fava, Oleg B Kariakine, Peter Whelan, Urs E Studer, Theo M De Reijke, Paul J Kil, Lesley A Rea.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In preparation of an intercontinental Phase III trial comparing continuous maximal androgen blockade (MAB) to intermittent androgen suppression (IAS) in untreated metastatic prostate cancer, a feasibility study on IAS was accomplished.
METHODS: 107 patients (median follow-up 92 weeks) were treated with MAB until a PSA nadir was reached. Nadir was defined as PSA below 20 ng/ml corresponding to PSA reduction by at least 80% of baseline value. Criteria for restarting treatment was PSA >20 ng/ml and PSA > nadir + 50%. Trials aim was to assess the likelihood that 80% of patients would reach a first nadir and that 80% of these would also reach a second nadir.
RESULTS: 51.4% of patients had some degree of pain at entry, 27.1% had >15 hot spots, 23.7% demonstrated obstruction. Only 17.8% had normal potency, 56.1% were totally impotent. One to seven cycles of treatment were given. 76.6% of patients reached a 1st nadir after a median of 19 weeks of treatment, 84.1% of these started the 2nd cycle and 71% of them reached a 2nd nadir after a median of 13.6 weeks. Median time off-treatment was 14.3 and 16.0 weeks corresponding to 38.4% and 48.5% of the duration of each cycle. A similar proportion of patients was reported to be potent during follow-up compared to baseline. 32.7% of patients died during follow-up, 82.9% of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION: Around 75% of the patients achieved a nadir at each cycle. The concept of IAS seems to be feasible and warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572746     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00375-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

1.  Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: redefining the standard of care?

Authors:  Neal D Shore; E David Crawford
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

2.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression therapy: do we have consensus yet?

Authors:  N C Buchan; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Intermittent androgen suppression for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas C Buchan; S Larry Goldenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Prolongation of off-cycle interval by finasteride is not associated with survival improvement in intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in LNCaP tumor model.

Authors:  Yujuan Wang; Shubham Gupta; Vi Hua; Raquel Ramos-Garcia; Daniel Shevrin; Borko D Jovanovic; Joel B Nelson; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  A randomized, phase II study of pazopanib in castrate-sensitive prostate cancer: a University of Chicago Phase II Consortium/Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium study.

Authors:  J E Ward; T Karrison; G Chatta; M Hussain; D Shevrin; R Z Szmulewitz; P H O'Donnell; W M Stadler; E M Posadas
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.554

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.