Literature DB >> 1457264

Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation.

M Hindle1, H Chrystyn.   

Abstract

1. The urinary excretion of salbutamol and its sulphate metabolite was measured following oral (4 mg) and inhaled (4 x 100 micrograms) administration of salbutamol. 2. Total urinary recovery of salbutamol and its sulphate conjugate indicated a mean (s.d.) relative bioavailability of 92.2 (24.8) % following inhalation compared with oral administration. 3. The mean (s.d.) elimination half-lives of salbutamol and its sulphate conjugate were 5.7 (1.4) and 4.1 (2.1) h, respectively, after oral administration and following inhalation they were 6.1 (2.1) and 5.1 (1.0) h, respectively. 4. Following oral and inhaled administration it was found that in the first 30 min the mean (s.d.) percentage of the dose excreted in the urine as unchanged salbutamol was 0.18 (0.14) and 2.06 (0.80) %, respectively (P < 0.01). The drug content of a urine sample taken 30 min after inhalation is, therefore, considered to be representative of the amount of drug delivered to the lungs. It is proposed that this method can be used to evaluate the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation by different techniques and devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1457264      PMCID: PMC1381412          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb05921.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  10 in total

1.  Plasma concentrations of salbutamol in acute severe asthmatics.

Authors:  L D Lewis; M McLaren; E Essex; G M Cochrane
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1990-06

2.  Comparison of intravenous and aerosol salbutamol.

Authors:  M R Hetzel; T J Clark
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-16

3.  Does urinary salbutamol reflect compliance with the aerosol regimen in patients with asthma?

Authors:  C R Horn; E Essex; P Hill; G M Cochrane
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.415

4.  Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of sublingual salbutamol in patients with asthma.

Authors:  B J Lipworth; R A Clark; D P Dhillon; T A Moreland; A D Struthers; G A Clark; D G McDevitt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral salbutamol and its sulphate conjugate.

Authors:  D J Morgan; J D Paull; B H Richmond; E Wilson-Evered; S P Ziccone
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Laboratory and clinical features of self-poisoning with salbutamol and terbutaline.

Authors:  D R Jarvie; A M Thompson; E H Dyson
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  The fate of inhaled terbutaline.

Authors:  D S Davies
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis Suppl       Date:  1984

8.  A method for determination of the absolute pulmonary bioavailability of inhaled drugs: terbutaline.

Authors:  L Borgström; M Nilsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Salbutamol: a new, selective beta-adrenoceptive receptor stimulant.

Authors:  V A Cullum; J B Farmer; D Jack; G P Levy
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Deposition of pressurised aerosols in the human respiratory tract.

Authors:  S P Newman; D Pavia; F Morén; N F Sheahan; S W Clarke
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.139

  10 in total
  37 in total

1.  Relative bioavailability of sodium cromoglycate to the lung following inhalation, using urinary excretion.

Authors:  O A Aswania; S A Corlett; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Can lung deposition data act as a surrogate for the clinical response to inhaled asthma drugs?

Authors:  S P Newman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Methods to determine lung distribution of inhaled drugs - could gamma scintigraphy be the gold standard?

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Lung distribution of inhaled drugs.

Authors:  S P Newman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Discriminating measures of bronchodilator drug efficacy and potency.

Authors:  H Buck; M Parry-Billings
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation when administration is prolonged.

Authors:  V L Silkstone; H S Tomlinson; S A Corlett; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Methods to identify drug deposition in the lungs following inhalation.

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Ethical aspects of using radiolabelling in aerosol research.

Authors:  M L Everard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Dose-response relationship and reproducibility of urinary salbutamol excretion during the first 30 min after an inhalation.

Authors:  H S Tomlinson; S A Corlett; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Determination of the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and systemic circulation following nebulization.

Authors:  V L Silkstone; S A Corlett; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.