Literature DB >> 14571518

Exposing the "myth" of ABC, "anything but chrysotile": a critique of the Canadian asbestos mining industry and McGill University chrysotile studies.

David Egilman1, Corey Fehnel, Susanna Rankin Bohme.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beginning in the 1930s, the Canadian asbestos industry created and advanced the idea that chrysotile asbestos is safer than asbestos of other fiber types.
METHODS: We critically evaluate published and unpublished studies funded by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (QAMA) and performed by researchers at McGill University.
RESULTS: QAMA-funded researchers put forth several myths purporting that Quebec-mined chrysotile was harmless, and contended that the contamination of chrysotile with oils, tremolite, or crocidolite was the source of occupational health risk. In addition, QAMA-funded researchers manipulated data and used unsound sampling and analysis techniques to back up their contention that chrysotile was "essentially innocuous."
CONCLUSIONS: These studies were used to promote the marketing and sales of asbestos, and have had a substantial effect on policy and occupational health litigation. Asbestos manufacturing companies and the Canadian government continue to use them to promote the use of asbestos in Europe and in developing countries. Am. J. Ind. Med. 44:540-557, 2003. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14571518     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  8 in total

1.  Asbestos-related disease in South Africa: the social production of an invisible epidemic.

Authors:  Lundy Braun; Sophia Kisting
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Asbestos is still with us: repeat call for a universal ban.

Authors:  Collegium Ramazzini
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Truer Facts Through Stronger Values: Confronting Science's Sociopolitical Realities.

Authors:  Nadja Eisenberg-Guyot; Jerzy Eisenberg-Guyot
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2021-11-26

4.  Talc, Asbestos, and Epidemiology: Corporate Influence and Scientific Incognizance.

Authors:  Triet H Tran; Joan E Steffen; Kate M Clancy; Tess Bird; David S Egilman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  How can the integrity of occupational and environmental health research be maintained in the presence of conflicting interests?

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Colin L Soskolne; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Mining, Colonial Legacies, and Neoliberalism: A Political Ecology of Health Knowledge : Minerıa, legados coloniales y neoliberalismo: una ecologıa polıtica del conocimiento en salud.

Authors:  Ben Brisbois; Mathieu Feagan; Bjorn Stime; Isaac K Paz; Marta Berbés-Blázquez; Juan Gaibor; Donald C Cole; Erica Di Ruggiero; Lori Hanson; Craig R Janes; Katrina M Plamondon; Jerry M Spiegel; Annalee Yassi
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2021-03-11

7.  The asbestos cancer epidemic.

Authors:  Joseph LaDou
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Ongoing downplaying of the carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos by vested interests.

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Arthur L Frank
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.646

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.