Literature DB >> 14571166

Impact of laparoscopy on frequency of surgery for treatment of gallstones.

A Kessaf Aslar1, Tamer Ertan, Hakan Oguz, Erdal Gocmen, Mahmut Koc.   

Abstract

Although the indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy are generally the same as those for open cholecystectomy, there has been a suspicion that indications for cholecystectomy have broadened and the spectrum of patients undergoing this procedure has changed. This study was designed to determine whether surgeons and patients have lowered the threshold for proceeding to cholecystectomy with use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Discharge data were collected for all patients who underwent an elective operation in general surgery clinics in Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital between 1990 to 2001. The rate of total cholecystectomy to all elective operations and rate of laparoscopic technique to all cholecystectomies were analyzed. Total number of operations and rate of cholecystectomy were relatively stable over 6 years prior to laparoscopy. With the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although total number of elective operations seems stable, the proportion of cholecystectomy to all operations showed an increase. Our study could not explain the increase of total number of cholecystectomies since the widespread introduction of laparoscopy. First, it may be due to changing selection criteria for surgical treatment of gallstones. Second, surgery may have been done for asymptomatic gallstones. And third, patients with moderate symptoms who refused the (open) operation in the past may now be more willing to undergo a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14571166     DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200310000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in diabetic patients and postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Hannu Paajanen; Satu Suuronen; Pia Nordstrom; Pekka Miettinen; Leo Niskanen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cholelithiasis in patients on the kidney transplant waiting list.

Authors:  André Thiago Scandiuzzi Brito; Luiz Sergio Azevedo; Willian Carlos Nahas; André Siqueira Matheus; José Jukemura
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Registration of health-related quality of life in a cohort of patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Simon Henry Pålsson; Ib Rasmussen; Patrik Lundström; Johanna Osterberg; Gabriel Sandblom
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-21

5.  Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Jang; Young Hoon Roh; Chan Joong Choi; Min Chan Kim; Kwan Woo Kim; Hong Jo Choi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Increased rate of cholecystectomies performed with doubtful or no indications after laparoscopy introduction: a single center experience.

Authors:  Elia Pulvirenti; Adriana Toro; Michel Gagner; Maurizio Mannino; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.