BACKGROUND: IgA serum autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) have an established diagnostic value in coeliac disease, and high efficacy tests are widely available for their detection. However, serological evaluation of IgA deficient subjects is still difficult. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of IgG class anti-tTG autoantibodies measured quantitatively using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) compared with immunofluorescent detection of coeliac autoantibodies. PATIENTS: We tested serum samples from 325 IgA deficient subjects, including 78 patients with coeliac disease, 73 disease controls, and 174 blood donors. METHODS: IgG antibodies against human recombinant tTG were measured with an ELISA. IgG antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) were assayed by indirect immunofluorescence on human jejunum and appendix sections. RESULTS: The IgG anti-tTG ELISA had a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 98.6%, and the correlation with IgG EMA titres was high (r(s)=0.91). One coeliac patient, initially negative in all autoantibody tests, displayed both IgG anti-tTG antibodies and IgG EMA during later gluten exposure. IgG anti-tTG antibodies and EMA titres showed significant decreases (p<0.001) in treated patients. The frequency of IgG anti-tTG autoantibody positivity was 9.8% among IgA deficient blood donors and 11 of the 12 positive subjects with known HLA-DQ haplotypes carried DQ2 or DQ8 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: IgG anti-tTG and IgG EMA autoantibody tests are highly efficient in detecting coeliac disease in IgA deficient patients. The high prevalence of coeliac antibodies among symptom free IgA deficient blood donors who also carry coeliac-type HLA-DQ genes indicates that all IgA deficient persons should be evaluated for coeliac disease.
BACKGROUND: IgA serum autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) have an established diagnostic value in coeliac disease, and high efficacy tests are widely available for their detection. However, serological evaluation of IgA deficient subjects is still difficult. AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of IgG class anti-tTG autoantibodies measured quantitatively using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) compared with immunofluorescent detection of coeliac autoantibodies. PATIENTS: We tested serum samples from 325 IgA deficient subjects, including 78 patients with coeliac disease, 73 disease controls, and 174 blood donors. METHODS: IgG antibodies against human recombinant tTG were measured with an ELISA. IgG antiendomysium antibodies (EMA) were assayed by indirect immunofluorescence on human jejunum and appendix sections. RESULTS: The IgG anti-tTG ELISA had a sensitivity of 98.7% and a specificity of 98.6%, and the correlation with IgG EMA titres was high (r(s)=0.91). One coeliac patient, initially negative in all autoantibody tests, displayed both IgG anti-tTG antibodies and IgG EMA during later gluten exposure. IgG anti-tTG antibodies and EMA titres showed significant decreases (p<0.001) in treated patients. The frequency of IgG anti-tTG autoantibody positivity was 9.8% among IgA deficient blood donors and 11 of the 12 positive subjects with known HLA-DQ haplotypes carried DQ2 or DQ8 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: IgG anti-tTG and IgG EMA autoantibody tests are highly efficient in detecting coeliac disease in IgA deficient patients. The high prevalence of coeliac antibodies among symptom free IgA deficient blood donors who also carry coeliac-type HLA-DQ genes indicates that all IgA deficient persons should be evaluated for coeliac disease.
Authors: C Catassi; G Fanciulli; A R D'Appello; R El Asmar; C Rondina; E Fabiani; I Bearzi; G V Coppa Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Tony Hansson; Ingrid Dahlbom; Siv Rogberg; Anders Dannaeus; Peter Hopfl; Heidi Gut; Wolfgang Kraaz; Lars Klareskog Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: A Picarelli; L Sabbatella; M Di Tola; F Gabrielli; R Greco; T Di Cello; A Mastracchio; M C Anania Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: D Sblattero; I Berti; C Trevisiol; R Marzari; A Tommasini; A Bradbury; A Fasano; A Ventura; T Not Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: P Price; C Witt; R Allcock; D Sayer; M Garlepp; C C Kok; M French; S Mallal; F Christiansen Journal: Immunol Rev Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 12.988
Authors: Ning Wang; Nan Shen; Timothy J Vyse; Vidya Anand; Iva Gunnarson; Gunnar Sturfelt; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Kerstin Elvin; Lennart Truedsson; Bengt A Andersson; Charlotte Dahle; Eva Ortqvist; Peter K Gregersen; Timothy W Behrens; Lennart Hammarström Journal: Mol Med Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: M Ankelo; V Kleimola; S Simell; O Simell; M Knip; E Jokisalo; M Tarkia; A Westerlund; Q He; M Viander; J Ilonen; A E Hinkkanen Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 4.330