Literature DB >> 14570356

Characterizing the performance and outcomes of obesity surgery in California.

Jerome H Liu1, David Zingmond, David A Etzioni, Jessica B O'Connell, Melinda A Maggard, Edward H Livingston, Carson D Liu, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

Between 1991 and 2000, the prevalence of obesity increased 65 per cent. As a result, increasing research is being directed at gastric bypass (GB) surgery, an operation that appears to achieve long-term weight reduction. Despite the rapid proliferation of this surgery, the quality of care at a population level is largely unknown. This study examines longitudinal trends in quality and identifies significant predictors of adverse outcomes. Using the California inpatient discharge database, all GB operations from 1996 to 2000 were identified. Demographic, comorbidity, complication, and volume data were obtained. Complications were defined as life-threatening cardiac, respiratory, or medical (renal failure or shock) events. Comorbidity was graded on a modified Charlson score. Annual hospital volume was categorized into four groups: < 50, 50-99, 100-199, and 200+ cases. Based on these data, we calculated longitudinal trends in complication rate and performed logistic regression to identify predictors of complications. A total of 16,232 patients were included. The average age was 41 years; 84 per cent were female, and 83.5 per cent were white. The complication rate was 10.4 per cent. Between 1996 and 2000, rates of cardiac and respiratory complications decreased while rates of medical complications remained unchanged. Complications were more likely in men [odd ratio (OR) = 1.69 compared to women] and in patients with comorbidities (OR = 1.60 for each additional comorbid disease). Furthermore, when examining the effect of volume, patients at very low (< 50) and low (50-99) volume hospitals were much more likely to have complications (OR = 2.72 and 2.70, respectively) compared to patients at high-volume hospitals (200+), even after controlling for differences in case-mix. The quality of care for obesity surgery has improved between 1996 and 2000. Despite operating on patients with more comorbidity, rates of cardiac and respiratory complications have decreased. Furthermore, this study identifies three independent predictors of complications: gender, comorbidity, and hospital volume. These findings are important initial steps toward improving quality in obesity surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14570356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a multicenter, prospective, risk-adjusted analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Sheldon Randall; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; William M Abbott; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Mahbod Paya; C Melinda Stevens; Shahrzad Mavandadi; Kambiz Zainabadi; Samuel E Wilson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The impact of hospital and surgeon volume on clinical outcome following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Marta Penna; Alan Karthikesalingam; Majid Hashemi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Clinical outcomes after bariatric surgery: a five-year matched cohort analysis in seven US states.

Authors:  Shari Danielle Bolen; Hsien-Yen Chang; Jonathan P Weiner; Thomas M Richards; Andrew D Shore; Suzanne M Goodwin; Roger A Johns; Thomas H Magnuson; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Nancy Puzziferri; Jeanne Blankenship; Bruce M Wolfe
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 6.  Laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  B Schirmer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Monica T Young; Brian R Smith; Michael J Phalen; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the clinical and economic evidence.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Scott Klarenbach; Natasha Wiebe; Maureen Hazel; Daniel Birch; Shahzeer Karmali; Arya M Sharma; Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity.

Authors:  Adolfo Z Fernandez; Eric J Demaria; David S Tichansky; John M Kellum; Luke G Wolfe; Jill Meador; Harvey J Sugerman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Relationship between surgeon volume and adverse outcomes after RYGB in Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) study.

Authors:  Mark D Smith; Emma Patterson; Abdus S Wahed; Steven H Belle; Marc Bessler; Anita P Courcoulas; David Flum; Valerie Halpin; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Bruce Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.734

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.