Literature DB >> 14570243

Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Randall C Beattie1, O T Kenworthy, Christina A Luna.   

Abstract

This study assessed the test-retest reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at four frequencies (550, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) over three time intervals. The time intervals were: (1) immediate test-retest reliability, in which the retest followed the test without any delay or repositioning of the probe tip; (2) very short-term test-retest reliability, in which the retest followed a 10-20-min break and involved removal and re-insertion of the probe tip; and (3) short-term test-retest reliability, in which the retest was conducted 5-10 days after the test. Fifty normal-hearing women were tested with a commercially available system for measuring DPOAEs (Grason-Stadler, GSI-60), which generated primary tones at 65 dB SPL (L1=L2). Standard errors of measurement at 550 Hz (approximately 4.6 dB) were nearly twice as large as those found for 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz (approximately 2.5 dB). The short-term test-retest data suggest that there is a 95% probability that an individual's true DPOAE will fall within 5 dB of the obtained distortion product at 1000-4000 Hz and within 10 dB at 550 Hz. The standard error of measurement of the difference was calculated to assess whether two or more DPOAE measurements are significantly different (e.g. before versus after administration of an ototoxic drug or noise exposure). The data revealed that short-term differences (probe removed and subject retested on the same day or on different days) between two DPOAEs must exceed approximately 14 dB at 550 Hz and 7 dB at 1000-4000 Hz to be statistically significant at the 0.05 level of confidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14570243     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309101328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  15 in total

1.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for assessment of intracranial hypertension at extreme altitude?

Authors:  Bernhard Olzowy; Gregor von Gleichenstein; Martin Canis; Klaus Mees
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults.

Authors:  Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Prophylactic etanercept treatment in cisplatin ototoxicity.

Authors:  Sinem Dasli; Murat Topdag; Ahmet Mutlu; Ahmet Kara; Murat Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kristin Knight; Garnett P McMillan; Laura E Dreisbach; Elsa Nelson; Marilyn Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Modupe F Adegoke; Nicholas J Horton; Kevin N Sheth; Jonathan Rosand; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Monitoring carboplatin ototoxicity with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in children with retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Shaum P Bhagat; Johnnie K Bass; Stephanie T White; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Matthew W Wilson; Jianrong Wu; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 1.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.