Literature DB >> 14570237

Assessment of auditory processing in 6-year-old language-impaired children.

Martin H P Stollman1, Esther C W van Velzen, Harry M F Simkens, Ad F M Snik, Paul van den Broek.   

Abstract

The performance of a group of twenty 6-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) on several behavioural auditory tests was compared to that of a group of twenty age-matched control children. The auditory test battery used in this study consisted of the following tests: a speech-in-noise test, a filtered speech test, a binaural fusion test, a frequency pattern test, a duration pattern test, a temporal integration test, an auditory word discrimination test, an auditory synthesis test, an auditory closure test and a number recall test. Our results show that the SLI children obtained scores on almost all tests that were significantly lower than those of the control group. Many of the basic auditory processing measures in our test battery correlated significantly with receptive and language scores, suggesting a (causal) relationship between auditory processing and language proficiency. Results from discriminant function analyses do not warrant deleting one or more tests from the test battery yet (with the exception of the auditory synthesis test and the temporal integration test, for which we did not find significant group effects). At present, we are conducting experiments with older (SLI and control) children and adults to find whether the significant performance deficits of the SLI children are also found in older SLI children, and to determine the influence of maturational effects on these auditory tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14570237     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309101322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Does the Efferent Auditory System Have a Role in Children with Specific Learning Disabilities?

Authors:  Emine Demirel Aksoy; Belde Culhaoğlu; F Ceyda Akın Öcal; Selim Sermed Erbek; Hatice Seyra Erbek
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  A European Perspective on Auditory Processing Disorder-Current Knowledge and Future Research Focus.

Authors:  Vasiliki Vivian Iliadou; Martin Ptok; Helen Grech; Ellen Raben Pedersen; André Brechmann; Naïma Deggouj; Christiane Kiese-Himmel; Mariola Śliwińska-Kowalska; Andreas Nickisch; Laurent Demanez; Evelyne Veuillet; Hung Thai-Van; Tony Sirimanna; Marina Callimachou; Rosamaria Santarelli; Sandra Kuske; Jose Barajas; Mladen Hedjever; Ozlem Konukseven; Dorothy Veraguth; Tone Stokkereit Mattsson; Jorge Humberto Martins; Doris-Eva Bamiou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.

Authors:  Kevin Chi Pun Yuen; Xin Yue Qiu; Hong Yu Mou; Xin Xi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Same or Different: The Overlap Between Children With Auditory Processing Disorders and Children With Other Developmental Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ellen de Wit; Pim van Dijk; Sandra Hanekamp; Margot I Visser-Bochane; Bert Steenbergen; Cees P van der Schans; Margreet R Luinge
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.