Literature DB >> 14569607

Safety of donating multiple products in a single apheresis collection: are we expecting too much?

Ronald G Strauss1.   

Abstract

Modern blood separators rapidly process many liters of donor blood and efficiently collect vast quantities of blood components from donors, who may be stimulated with potent recombinant hematopoietic growth factors or cytokines. Accordingly, the potential risks of modern multiple product/unit apheresis donations and recombinant growth factors is analyzed in this report. As is true for all medical procedures, risks are associated with apheresis donations. Risks of a "standard" apheresis donation, in which one unit of PLTs or plasma is collected, are comparable to the risks of whole blood donation. Risks of multiple unit apheresis donations, in which either vast quantities of a single blood component or multiple units of various components are collected, are incompletely understood, particularly, when donors are stimulated with recombinant hematopoietic growth factors to increase component yields. To minimize donor risks and to increase knowledge of multiple component apheresis donations, both short-term problems (e.g., donor reactions accompanying apheresis procedures and pre- vs. post-procedure changes in results of donor laboratory studies) and long-term problems (e.g., medical diagnoses/problems and abnormalities of donor blood counts and laboratory test results) should be monitored, ideally, by a repeat donor registry. When recombinant hematopoietic growth factors are prescribed, donors should give informed consent, and blood center professionals must be aware of 1) the effects of these drugs given at pharmacologic, rather than physiologic, doses; 2) the differences between the molecular structure of recombinant vs. natural/endogenous growth factors; 3) the fact that recombinant growth factors have both narrow/focused and broad biological activities; and 4) the probability that results of studies in sick/immunosuppressed patients may not be applicable to healthy/immunocompetent donors. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569607     DOI: 10.1002/jca.10069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.

Authors:  Fevzi Altuntas; Ismail Sari; Ismail Kocyigit; Leylagul Kaynar; Sibel Hacioglu; Ahmet Ozturk; Mehmet Oztekin; Musa Solmaz; Bulent Eser; Mustafa Cetin; Ali Unal
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.747

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.