OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between limb function and radiographic evidence of stifle osteoarthrosis (OA) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: The relationship between force platform data and radiographic OA score was evaluated on 2 separate days using regression analysis. Interday variation was also assessed. ANIMALS: Forty-one dogs with visible lameness and radiographic evidence of stifle OA. METHODS: Force platform data were collected at a velocity of 1.7 to 2.0 m/s for 5 trials on day 1 and day 8. Radiographs taken on day 1 were scored using a previously reported OA scoring system. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between force platform data and OA score. No significant differences were found between any day 1 and day 8 force platform values. CONCLUSIONS: Although radiographic evidence of stifle OA provides evidence of pathology, it does a poor job of representing limb function. In addition, the absence of significant differences between day 1 and day 8 values in this population of dogs supports use of only a single force platform evaluation before measuring a treatment effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presence of OA in the stifle joint does not correlate with clinical function; radiographic outcome should be used cautiously as a predictor of clinical outcome. Copyright 2003 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between limb function and radiographic evidence of stifle osteoarthrosis (OA) in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: The relationship between force platform data and radiographic OA score was evaluated on 2 separate days using regression analysis. Interday variation was also assessed. ANIMALS: Forty-one dogs with visible lameness and radiographic evidence of stifle OA. METHODS: Force platform data were collected at a velocity of 1.7 to 2.0 m/s for 5 trials on day 1 and day 8. Radiographs taken on day 1 were scored using a previously reported OA scoring system. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between force platform data and OA score. No significant differences were found between any day 1 and day 8 force platform values. CONCLUSIONS: Although radiographic evidence of stifle OA provides evidence of pathology, it does a poor job of representing limb function. In addition, the absence of significant differences between day 1 and day 8 values in this population of dogs supports use of only a single force platform evaluation before measuring a treatment effect. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presence of OA in the stifle joint does not correlate with clinical function; radiographic outcome should be used cautiously as a predictor of clinical outcome. Copyright 2003 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons
Authors: Pascale Rialland; Sylvain Bichot; Bertrand Lussier; Maxim Moreau; Francis Beaudry; Jérôme R E del Castillo; Dominique Gauvin; Eric Troncy Journal: Can J Vet Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 1.310
Authors: Andrea M DeLuke; Dave A Allen; Eric R Wilson; Jayce A Lineberger; Terry W Lehenbauer; Michelle Fabiani; Brian A Poteet Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Francesco Macrì; Luca Cicero; Vito Angileri; Vito Biondi; Piero Miele; Lorenzo Scaletta; Giovanna Lucrezia Costa; Giovanni Cassata; Simona Di Pietro Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Jose M Vilar; Manuel Morales; Angelo Santana; Giuseppe Spinella; Mónica Rubio; Belen Cuervo; Ramón Cugat; Jose M Carrillo Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 2.741