Literature DB >> 14569481

Evaluation of physical findings in acute wrist trauma in the emergency department.

Arif Alper Cevik1, Izge Gunal, Metin Manisali, Sedat Yanturali, Ridvan Atilla, Murat Pekdemir, Ali Gunerli, C James Holliman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of physical findings to predict fracture in patients with acute wrist trauma.
METHODS: This prospective clinical study was conducted over a period of four months from December 1998. The patients who were older than 18 years and presenting with acute wrist trauma within 24 hours of the time of injury were included in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done for the patients who had inconsistency between clinical and radiographic diagnosis.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. Four fractures were diagnosed on the MRI of eight patients who have contradiction between clinical diagnosis and X-ray studies. The positive predictive values of edema, localized tenderness, pain on active and passive motion, pain with grip and pain in supination were found as 95.2%, 67.3%, 77.3%, 91,7%, 89.3%, and 96%, respectively. Physical findings having high sensitivity were found as localized tenderness (94.3%), pain on the active and passive motion (97.1%, 94.3%, respectively). Pain on the active and passive motion were determined as physical findings with highest negative predictive values (%90.9, %89.5, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Edema, pain on grip and supination, and especially pain on passive and active motion and localized tenderness can be valuable to predict or rule out fracture in acute wrist trauma cases who have no deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg


  6 in total

1.  Amsterdam wrist rules: a clinical decision aid.

Authors:  Abdelali Bentohami; Monique M J Walenkamp; Annelie Slaar; M Suzan H Beerekamp; Joris A H de Groot; Eva M Verhoog; L Cara Jager; Mario Maas; Taco S Bijlsma; Bart A van Dijkman; Niels W L Schep; J Carel Goslings; Carel J Goslings
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Sideline coverage: when to get radiographs? A review of clinical decision tools.

Authors:  Sara J Gould; Dennis A Cardone; John Munyak; Philipp J Underwood; Stephen A Gould
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  A pilot study to identify clinical predictors for wrist fractures in adult patients with acute wrist injury.

Authors:  Anne Brants; Michiel A IJsseldijk
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-11

4.  The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma.

Authors:  Monique M J Walenkamp; Abdelali Bentohami; Annelie Slaar; M Suzan H Beerekamp; Mario Maas; L Cara Jager; Nico L Sosef; Romuald van Velde; Jan M Ultee; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Carel Goslings; Niels W L Schep
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study.

Authors:  Marjolein A M Mulders; Monique M J Walenkamp; Nico L Sosef; Frank Ouwehand; Romuald van Velde; Carel J Goslings; Niels W L Schep
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Short and long arm cast and pain after discharge in children who underwent reduction of distal forearm fracture in the Emergency Department: A study protocol for a randomized comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Martina Giacalone; Tali Capua; Itai Shavit
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.