Literature DB >> 1456934

Those cheating rats: male and female rats use odor trails in a water-escape "working memory" task.

L W Means1, S R Alexander, M F O'Neal.   

Abstract

Three-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats were trained on a working memory win-stay (spatial delayed matching-to-sample) water-escape task with the escape platform location the same for all subjects on a given trial, a procedure that maximizes the buildup of an odor trail to the escape platform. In subsequent tests during which the location of the escape platform varied randomly between subjects, the rats, especially the females, while continuing to perform above chance level, made increased errors. Varying the platform location between subjects eliminated odor trail as a nonambiguous cue for locating the escape platform. In a second experiment females performed better than males on a reference memory odor trail discrimination task which involved following the path of like-gender "pathmaker" rats to the escape platform. The relatively poor use of odor trails by the males was associated with a high frequency of choosing a preferred choice section or returning to the choice section selected first on the immediately preceding trial (perseveration). Collectively, the two experiments demonstrate that rats can use either working memory or odor trails to locate an escape platform in a water maze, and that they, especially females, will use odor trails in a working memory task if odor trails are available. Clearly, the location of the escape platform should be varied randomly between subjects in tests of working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1456934     DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90387-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  9 in total

Review 1.  From chemotaxis to the cognitive map: the function of olfaction.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of neonatal (+)-methamphetamine on path integration and spatial learning in rats: effects of dose and rearing conditions.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Nicole R Herring; Tori L Schaefer; Curtis E Grace; Matthew R Skelton; Holly L Johnson; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.457

Review 3.  Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

4.  Sex dimorphisms in the rate of age-related decline in spatial memory: relevance to alterations in the estrous cycle.

Authors:  A L Markowska
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differences in learning and memory between middle-aged female and male rats.

Authors:  Natalia Claudia Colettis; Martín Habif; María Victoria Oberholzer; Federico Filippin; Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  Mice Develop Efficient Strategies for Foraging and Navigation Using Complex Natural Stimuli.

Authors:  David H Gire; Vikrant Kapoor; Annie Arrighi-Allisan; Agnese Seminara; Venkatesh N Murthy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Fractionating dead reckoning: role of the compass, odometer, logbook, and home base establishment in spatial orientation.

Authors:  Douglas G Wallace; Megan M Martin; Shawn S Winter
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-14

Review 8.  Spatial information from the odour environment in mammalian olfaction.

Authors:  Alina Cristina Marin; Andreas T Schaefer; Tobias Ackels
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Mouse Navigation Strategies for Odor Source Localization.

Authors:  Annie Liu; Andrew E Papale; James Hengenius; Khusbu Patel; Bard Ermentrout; Nathan N Urban
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.