Literature DB >> 14569287

Microbial ecology of Bacillus thuringiensis: fecal populations recovered from wildlife in Korea.

Dong-Hyun Lee1, In Hwan Cha, Doo Sung Woo, Michio Ohba.   

Abstract

A total of 34 fecal samples, collected from 14 species of wild mammals in Korea, were examined for the occurrence of Bacillus thuringiensis. The organism was detected in 18 (53%) samples. Among the three food-habit groups, herbivorous animals yielded the highest frequency (69%) of samples positive for B. thuringiensis, followed by omnivorous animals (50%). Of the six fecal samples from carnivorous animals, only one sample contained B. thurin giensis. Among 527 isolates belonging to the Bacillus cereus - B. thuringiensis group, 43 (8%) were assigned to B. thurin giensis on the basis of the formation of parasporal inclusions. Of the 43 isolates, 13 were serologically allocated to the nine H-antigenic serotypes: H3ad (serovar sumiyoshiensis), H15 (dakota), H17/27 (tohokuensis/ mexicanensis), H19 (tochigiensis), H21 (colmeri), H29 (amagiensis), H31/49 (toguchini/muju), H42 (jinghongiensis), and H44 (higo). Other isolates were untestable or untypable by the 55 reference H antisera available. Insecticidal activity was associated with 23% of the fecal populations: three isolates killed larvae of the silkworm, Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera), and seven exhibited larvicidal activity against the mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Diptera). There was no larvicidal activity against the three lepidopterous insects: Plutella xylostella, Spodoptera exigua, and Spodoptera litura. The overall results suggest that wild animals in Korea are in contact with naturally occurring B. thuringiensis at high frequencies through the daily food intake of plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14569287     DOI: 10.1139/w03-063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  6 in total

1.  Occurrence of Bacillus thuringiensis and their phages in Yemen soil.

Authors:  Gamal El-Didamony
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Microbial ecology and association of Bacillus thuringiensis in chicken feces originating from feed.

Authors:  Lingling Zhang; Yan Peng; Songqing Wu; Linying Sun; Enjiong Huang; Tianpei Huang; Lei Xu; Changbiao Wu; Ivan Gelbič; Xiong Guan
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  An investigation of bacillus thuringiensis in rectal-collected fecal samples of cows.

Authors:  David R Ammons; Antonio Reyna; Jose Cristobal Granados; Michael S Samlal; Joanne N Rampersad
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 4.  A Review of the Effects and Production of Spore-Forming Probiotics for Poultry.

Authors:  Igor V Popov; Ammar Algburi; Evgeniya V Prazdnova; Maria S Mazanko; Vladimir Elisashvili; Anzhelica B Bren; Vladimir A Chistyakov; Elizaveta V Tkacheva; Vladimir I Trukhachev; Irina M Donnik; Yuri A Ivanov; Dmitry Rudoy; Alexey M Ermakov; Richard M Weeks; Michael L Chikindas
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Molecular Identification of Bacillus Isolated from Korean Water Deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) and Striped Field Mouse (Apodemus agrarius) Feces by Using an SNP-Based 16S Ribosomal Marker.

Authors:  Md-Mafizur Rahman; Sang-Jin Lim; Yung-Chul Park
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  Dissecting the Environmental Consequences of Bacillus thuringiensis Application for Natural Ecosystems.

Authors:  Maria E Belousova; Yury V Malovichko; Anton E Shikov; Anton A Nizhnikov; Kirill S Antonets
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.