Literature DB >> 14568487

Differences between auditory evoked responses recorded during spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks.

Irina Anurova1, Denis Artchakov, Antti Korvenoja, Risto J Ilmoniemi, Hannu J Aronen, Synnöve Carlson.   

Abstract

Results from several recent studies suggest that neuronal processing of sound content and its spatial location may be dissociated. The use of modern neuroimaging techniques has allowed for the determination that different brain structures may be specifically activated during working memory processing of pitch and location of sound. The time course of these task-related differences, however, remains uncertain. In the present study, we performed simultaneous whole-head electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram recordings, using a new behavioral paradigm, to investigate the dynamics of differences between "what" and "where" evoked responses in the auditory system as a function of memory load. In the location task the latency of the N1m was shorter and its generator was situated more inferiorly than in the pitch task. Working memory processing of the tonal frequency enhanced the amplitude of the N2 component, as well as the negative-going deflection at a latency around 400 ms. A memory-load-dependent task-related difference was found in the positive slow wave which was higher during the location than pitch task at the low load. Late slow waves were affected by memory load but not type of task. These results suggest that separate neuronal networks are involved in the attribute-specific analysis of auditory stimuli and their encoding into working memory, whereas the maintenance of auditory information is accomplished by a common, nonspecific neuronal network.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14568487     DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00353-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Modality and domain specific components in auditory and visual working memory tasks.

Authors:  Günther Lehnert; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-22

Review 2.  Domain-dependent activation during spatial and nonspatial auditory working memory.

Authors:  Pia Rämä
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-21

3.  Multisensory integration of sounds and vibrotactile stimuli in processing streams for "what" and "where".

Authors:  Laurent A Renier; Irina Anurova; Anne G De Volder; Synnöve Carlson; John VanMeter; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  "What" and "where" in auditory sensory processing: a high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22

Review 5.  Dynamics of auditory working memory.

Authors:  Jochen Kaiser
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-11

Review 6.  Auditory connections and functions of prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Bethany Plakke; Lizabeth M Romanski
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Listening to an audio drama activates two processing networks, one for all sounds, another exclusively for speech.

Authors:  Robert Boldt; Sanna Malinen; Mika Seppä; Pia Tikka; Petri Savolainen; Riitta Hari; Synnöve Carlson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.