CONTEXT: Breast cancer is lethal when it metastasizes; one frequent site for spread is the central nervous system (CNS). Approximately 15% to 30% of breast cancers overexpress the protein HER-2/neu at the primary site, but there are few data on whether metastases from these tumors overexpress HER-2/neu and might be responsive to the potentially toxic anti-HER-2/neu immunotherapy (trastuzumab [Herceptin]) used in patients with disseminated disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess CNS breast cancer metastases for HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to compare the status in primary and metastatic sites in the same patient, whenever possible. DESIGN: Central nervous system breast cancer metastases (n = 53) from 33 patients and corresponding primary breast cancer specimens in a subset of these patients (n = 12) were retrospectively identified in surgical pathology and autopsy databases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using PathVysion probes for HER-2/neu and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP 17) and immunohistochemistry using the c-Erb-B2 antibody (Dako A0485) were compared. Immunohistochemical sections were evaluated by both visual and image analysis techniques. RESULTS: Of 31 cases assessable by FISH, 26% showed gene amplification. One hundred percent concordance for HER-2/neu status was detected between the primary and CNS metastatic lesions in 10 of 10 patients analyzed by FISH; lesser concordance was noted in 12 cases compared by immunohistochemistry. In 9 patients with multiple CNS metastases, FISH showed concordance among different lesions within the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: When FISH is the detection method, CNS metastases accurately reflect the HER-2/neu status of the primary tumor. Central nervous system metastases from breast cancer received as surgical specimens can therefore be used to assess HER-2/neu status in patients in whom the primary tumor is unavailable for analysis.
CONTEXT: Breast cancer is lethal when it metastasizes; one frequent site for spread is the central nervous system (CNS). Approximately 15% to 30% of breast cancers overexpress the protein HER-2/neu at the primary site, but there are few data on whether metastases from these tumors overexpress HER-2/neu and might be responsive to the potentially toxic anti-HER-2/neu immunotherapy (trastuzumab [Herceptin]) used in patients with disseminated disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess CNS breast cancer metastases for HER-2/neu protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to compare the status in primary and metastatic sites in the same patient, whenever possible. DESIGN:Central nervous system breast cancer metastases (n = 53) from 33 patients and corresponding primary breast cancer specimens in a subset of these patients (n = 12) were retrospectively identified in surgical pathology and autopsy databases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis using PathVysion probes for HER-2/neu and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP 17) and immunohistochemistry using the c-Erb-B2 antibody (Dako A0485) were compared. Immunohistochemical sections were evaluated by both visual and image analysis techniques. RESULTS: Of 31 cases assessable by FISH, 26% showed gene amplification. One hundred percent concordance for HER-2/neu status was detected between the primary and CNS metastatic lesions in 10 of 10 patients analyzed by FISH; lesser concordance was noted in 12 cases compared by immunohistochemistry. In 9 patients with multiple CNS metastases, FISH showed concordance among different lesions within the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: When FISH is the detection method, CNS metastases accurately reflect the HER-2/neu status of the primary tumor. Central nervous system metastases from breast cancer received as surgical specimens can therefore be used to assess HER-2/neu status in patients in whom the primary tumor is unavailable for analysis.
Authors: Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Renata Duchnowska; Jeff Sperinde; Ahmed Chenna; Weidong Huang; Jodi M Weidler; John Winslow; Mojgan Haddad; Agnes Paquet; Yolanda Lie; Tomasz Trojanowski; Tomasz Mandat; Anna Kowalczyk; Bogumiła Czartoryska-Arłukowicz; Barbara Radecka; Bożena Jarosz; Rafal Staszkiewicz; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Małgorzata Chudzik; Wojciech Biernat; Jacek Jassem Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Mu-min Shao; Jun Liu; Joaquim S Vong; Yun Niu; Barbara Germin; Ping Tang; Anthony W H Chan; Philip C W Lui; Bonita K B Law; Puay-Hoon Tan; Gary M Tse Journal: Med Mol Morphol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.309
Authors: Renata Duchnowska; Wojciech Biernat; Barbara Szostakiewicz; Jeff Sperinde; Fanny Piette; Mojgan Haddad; Agnes Paquet; Yolanda Lie; Bogumiła Czartoryska-Arłukowicz; Piotr Wysocki; Tomasz Jankowski; Barbara Radecka; Małgorzata Foszczynska-Kłoda; Maria Litwiniuk; Sylwia Debska; Jodi Weidler; Weidong Huang; Marc Buyse; Michael Bates; Jacek Jassem Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: C Bachmann; E M Grischke; T Fehm; A Staebler; J Schittenhelm; D Wallwiener Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Songdong Meng; Debasish Tripathy; Sanjay Shete; Raheela Ashfaq; Barbara Haley; Steve Perkins; Peter Beitsch; Amanullah Khan; David Euhus; Cynthia Osborne; Eugene Frenkel; Susan Hoover; Marilyn Leitch; Edward Clifford; Ellen Vitetta; Larry Morrison; Dorothee Herlyn; Leon W M M Terstappen; Timothy Fleming; Tanja Fehm; Thomas Tucker; Nancy Lane; Jianqiang Wang; Jonathan Uhr Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Richard Laforest; Suzanne E Lapi; Reiko Oyama; Ron Bose; Adel Tabchy; Bernadette V Marquez-Nostra; Jennifer Burkemper; Brian D Wright; Jennifer Frye; Sarah Frye; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.488