OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if newer Doppler diastolic function parameters are associated with age and to define age-stratified reference ranges for these parameters in a population-based setting. BACKGROUND: Although newer Doppler parameters aid in the evaluation of diastolic function and filling pressures, age-specific reference ranges are poorly described. METHODS:Randomly selected residents of Olmsted County, Minn, age >/= 45 years were studied (n = 2042) prospectively. Those without a history of cardiovascular disease or abnormal 2-dimensional echocardiograms were selected. Measured parameters included the transmitral early (E) and late (A) filling velocities at rest and with Valsalva, A duration, pulmonary venous atrial reversal duration, lateral and septal early diastolic mitral annular velocities, E/lateral early diastolic mitral annular velocity, E/septal early diastolic mitral annular velocity, and the index of left ventricular myocardial performance. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Both A duration (r = 0.18, P <.001) and pulmonary venous atrial reversal duration (r = 0.28, P <.001) were longer in older subjects, whereas their difference showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.07, P =.036). The E/A ratio at peak Valsalva correlated with age (r = -0.54, P <.001) whereas the change in E/A with Valsalva (corrected for E-A fusion) showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.08, P =.032). Both E/lateral early diastolic mitral annular velocity (r = 0.39, P <.001) and E/septal early diastolic mitral annular velocity (r = 0.27, P <.001) increased with age. Left ventricular myocardial performance showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.08, P =.014). Age specific reference ranges (median, 5th and 95th percentiles) for all parameters are provided. CONCLUSIONS: All newer Doppler diastolic function parameters showed a variable but significant correlation with age. Age-specific reference values will aid in the interpretation of diastolic function parameters.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if newer Doppler diastolic function parameters are associated with age and to define age-stratified reference ranges for these parameters in a population-based setting. BACKGROUND: Although newer Doppler parameters aid in the evaluation of diastolic function and filling pressures, age-specific reference ranges are poorly described. METHODS: Randomly selected residents of Olmsted County, Minn, age >/= 45 years were studied (n = 2042) prospectively. Those without a history of cardiovascular disease or abnormal 2-dimensional echocardiograms were selected. Measured parameters included the transmitral early (E) and late (A) filling velocities at rest and with Valsalva, A duration, pulmonary venous atrial reversal duration, lateral and septal early diastolic mitral annular velocities, E/lateral early diastolic mitral annular velocity, E/septal early diastolic mitral annular velocity, and the index of left ventricular myocardial performance. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Both A duration (r = 0.18, P <.001) and pulmonary venous atrial reversal duration (r = 0.28, P <.001) were longer in older subjects, whereas their difference showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.07, P =.036). The E/A ratio at peak Valsalva correlated with age (r = -0.54, P <.001) whereas the change in E/A with Valsalva (corrected for E-A fusion) showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.08, P =.032). Both E/lateral early diastolic mitral annular velocity (r = 0.39, P <.001) and E/septal early diastolic mitral annular velocity (r = 0.27, P <.001) increased with age. Left ventricular myocardial performance showed a marginal correlation with age (r = 0.08, P =.014). Age specific reference ranges (median, 5th and 95th percentiles) for all parameters are provided. CONCLUSIONS: All newer Doppler diastolic function parameters showed a variable but significant correlation with age. Age-specific reference values will aid in the interpretation of diastolic function parameters.
Authors: Andrew D Feingold; Dennis A Tighe; Gerard P Aurigemma; Jeffrey C Hill; Craig S Vinch Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: Louise H Naylor; Leonard F Arnolda; Jenny A Deague; David Playford; Antonio Maurogiovanni; Gerard O'Driscoll; Daniel J Green Journal: J Physiol Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Björn Goebel; Raoul Arnold; Eric Koletzki; Herbert E Ulmer; Joachim Eichhorn; Martin Borggrefe; Hans R Figulla; Tudor C Poerner Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2006-07-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Vandana Sachdev; Roberto F Machado; Yukitaka Shizukuda; Yesoda N Rao; Stanislav Sidenko; Inez Ernst; Marilyn St Peter; Wynona A Coles; Douglas R Rosing; William C Blackwelder; Oswaldo Castro; Gregory J Kato; Mark T Gladwin Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Nico R Van de Veire; Julie De Backer; An-Kristin Ascoop; Bart Middernacht; Anja Velghe; Johan De Sutter Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Joshua G Leichman; Erik B Wilson; Terry Scarborough; David Aguilar; Charles C Miller; Sherman Yu; Mohamed F Algahim; Manuel Reyes; Frank G Moody; Heinrich Taegtmeyer Journal: Am J Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.965