Literature DB >> 14565980

Induction of S. cerevisiae filamentous differentiation by slowed DNA synthesis involves Mec1, Rad53 and Swe1 checkpoint proteins.

Yi Wei Jiang1, Christopher Minkyu Kang.   

Abstract

A key question in eukaryotic differentiation is whether there are common regulators or biochemical events that are required for diverse types of differentiation or whether there is a core mechanism for differentiation. The unicellular model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoes filamentous differentiation in response to environmental cues. Because conserved cell cycle regulators, the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase Clb2/Cdc28, and its inhibitor Swe1 were found to be involved in both nitrogen starvation- and short chain alcohol-induced filamentous differentiation, they were identified as components of the core mechanism for filamentous differentiation. We report here that slowed DNA synthesis also induces yeast filamentous differentiation through conserved checkpoint proteins Mec1 and Rad53. Swe1 and Clb2 are also involved in this form of differentiation, and the core status of Swe1/Clb2/Cdc28 in the mechanism of filamentous differentiation has therefore been confirmed. Because the cAMP and filamentous growth mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways that mediate nitrogen starvation-induced filamentous differentiation are not required for slowed DNA synthesis-induced filamentous growth, they can therefore be excluded from the core mechanism. More significantly, slowed DNA synthesis also induces differentiation in mammalian cancer cells, and such stimulus conservation may indicate that the core mechanism for yeast filamentous differentiation is conserved in mammalian differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14565980      PMCID: PMC284813          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e03-06-0375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  37 in total

1.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration.

Authors:  G Rigaut; A Shevchenko; B Rutz; M Wilm; M Mann; B Séraphin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1.

Authors:  M N Boddy; B Furnari; O Mondesert; P Russell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Yeast pseudohyphal growth is regulated by GPA2, a G protein alpha homolog.

Authors:  M C Lorenz; J Heitman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  'Fusel' alcohols induce hyphal-like extensions and pseudohyphal formation in yeasts.

Authors:  J Richard Dickinson
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 5.  Role of antimetabolites of purine and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism in tumor cell differentiation.

Authors:  S Hatse; E De Clercq; J Balzarini
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C has a mutation in FLO8, a gene required for filamentous growth.

Authors:  H Liu; C A Styles; G R Fink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; M Huang; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor.

Authors:  M Huang; Z Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools.

Authors:  X Zhao; E G Muller; R Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Morphogenesis and the cell cycle.

Authors:  Audrey S Howell; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Identifying novel protein phenotype annotations by hybridizing protein-protein interactions and protein sequence similarities.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Yu-Hang Zhang; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Proteomic analysis of the S. cerevisiae response to the anticancer ruthenium complex KP1019.

Authors:  Laura K Stultz; Alexandra Hunsucker; Sydney Middleton; Evan Grovenstein; Jacob O'Leary; Eliot Blatt; Mary Miller; James Mobley; Pamela K Hanson
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.526

4.  The function and regulation of budding yeast Swe1 in response to interrupted DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Yanchang Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  The DNA damage checkpoint regulates a transition between yeast and hyphal growth in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus.

Authors:  Kanji Furuya; Hironori Niki
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Morphogenesis and cell cycle progression in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Judith Berman
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 7.934

7.  Phenotypes associated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hug1 protein, a putative negative regulator of dNTP Levels, reveal similarities and differences with sequence-related Dif1.

Authors:  Eunmi Kim; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.422

8.  Critical role of DNA checkpoints in mediating genotoxic-stress-induced filamentous growth in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Qing-Mei Shi; Yan-Ming Wang; Xin-De Zheng; Raymond Teck Ho Lee; Yue Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  The yeast PUF protein Puf5 has Pop2-independent roles in response to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Ana Traven; Tricia L Lo; Trevor Lithgow; Jörg Heierhorst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Filament formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae--a review.

Authors:  J R Dickinson
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.