BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the public's attitudes and their correlates towards patients with schizophrenia in rural areas. METHODS: The study was carried out in a village near Manisa City, Turkey. Two hundred and eight subjects completed the public survey form which consists of ten items screening demographic and health status and 32 items rating attitudes towards schizophrenia. RESULTS: Half of the subjects stated that persons with schizophrenia are aggressive and that they should not be free in the community. More than half of the subjects stated that they would be irritated about having a neighbour with schizophrenia (61.5%), that they would not rent their home to a person with schizophrenia (58.2%), that they do not want to work with a person with schizophrenia (61.1%), and that they would not get married to a person with schizophrenia (85.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The public in rural areas sufficiently recognises schizophrenia but has a tendency to stigmatise schizophrenic patients. Their attitudes are generally negative and rejective. They do not want close contact with schizophrenic patients. Interpretation of schizophrenia as a mental illness leads to more negative attitudes and increases the social distance.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the public's attitudes and their correlates towards patients with schizophrenia in rural areas. METHODS: The study was carried out in a village near Manisa City, Turkey. Two hundred and eight subjects completed the public survey form which consists of ten items screening demographic and health status and 32 items rating attitudes towards schizophrenia. RESULTS: Half of the subjects stated that persons with schizophrenia are aggressive and that they should not be free in the community. More than half of the subjects stated that they would be irritated about having a neighbour with schizophrenia (61.5%), that they would not rent their home to a person with schizophrenia (58.2%), that they do not want to work with a person with schizophrenia (61.1%), and that they would not get married to a person with schizophrenia (85.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The public in rural areas sufficiently recognises schizophrenia but has a tendency to stigmatise schizophrenicpatients. Their attitudes are generally negative and rejective. They do not want close contact with schizophrenicpatients. Interpretation of schizophrenia as a mental illness leads to more negative attitudes and increases the social distance.
Authors: Alina Beldie; Johan A den Boer; Cecilia Brain; Eric Constant; Maria Luisa Figueira; Igor Filipcic; Benoît Gillain; Miro Jakovljevic; Marek Jarema; Daniela Jelenova; Oguz Karamustafalioglu; Blanka Kores Plesnicar; Andrea Kovacsova; Klara Latalova; Josef Marksteiner; Filipa Palha; Jan Pecenak; Jan Prasko; Dan Prelipceanu; Petter Andreas Ringen; Norman Sartorius; Erich Seifritz; Jaromir Svestka; Magdalena Tyszkowska; Johannes Wancata Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: J Liu; F Yan; X Ma; H L Guo; Y L Tang; J J Rakofsky; X M Wu; X Q Li; H Zhu; X B Guo; Y Yang; P Li; X D Cao; H Y Li; Z B Li; P Wang; Q Y Xu Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Eduardo Adrian Leiderman; Gustavo Vazquez; Candela Berizzo; Ana Bonifacio; Noelia Bruscoli; Juan I Capria; Betina Ehrenhaus; Manuel Guerrero; Maria Guerrero; Maria Lolich; Roumen Milev Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-27 Impact factor: 4.328