Literature DB >> 14564262

Impaction grafting improves the fit of uncemented humeral arthroplasty.

Scott A Hacker1, Richard S Boorman, Steven B Lippitt, Frederick A Matsen.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that the excellence of the fit between a humeral prosthesis and the humerus can be optimized by impaction grafting with cancellous bone. Ten paired human humeri were prepared for insertion of a humeral implant by a standard surgical technique. One humerus from each pair was randomized to receive a 10-mm humeral component with cancellous impaction autografting, whereas the other was inserted without grafting. After insertion of a polymethylmethacrylate model of the prosthesis, computed tomography scans were obtained with 3-mm sections and the void areas of each section measured by use of NIH Image. The data demonstrate that cancellous impaction grafting significantly reduces the void between the prosthesis and the humerus (P <.001). The effect was most marked in the proximal and middle thirds of the implant. We conclude that cancellous impaction grafting is an effective method for improving the quality of fit between the humerus and the proximal two thirds of the humeral prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14564262     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00053-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Ream and run and total shoulder: patient and shoulder characteristics in five hundred forty-four concurrent cases.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Anastasia Whitson; Sarah E Jackins; Moni B Neradilek; Winston J Warme; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-03-16

6.  A Method to Facilitate Improved Positioning of a Reverse Prosthesis Stem During Arthroplasty Surgery: The Metaphyseal-centering Technique.

Authors:  C Scott Humphrey; Jonathan T Bravman
Journal:  Tech Shoulder Elb Surg       Date:  2018-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.