Literature DB >> 14564134

The differences between ACE inhibitor-treated and calcium channel blocker-treated hypertensive patients.

Gordon T McInnes1.   

Abstract

Large-scale outcome trials have demonstrated that blood pressure reduction with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is associated with reduced cardiovascular complications in hypertension. Comparative trials against conventional drugs and between ACE inhibitors and CCBs have failed to reveal conclusive differences in cause-specific outcomes. Studies in high-risk patients suggest that ACE inhibitors are superior to CCBs and other drugs in protection against cardiovascular events and renal disease. Very long-term prospectively collected observational data from the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic and the UK General Practice Research Database strongly support an advantage of ACE inhibitors over CCBs for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Considering all the available information, it can be concluded that the use of CCBs in the routine therapy of hypertension cannot be recommended while wider use of ACE inhibitors, along with low-dose diuretics and beta blockers, appears justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14564134      PMCID: PMC8101436          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.00511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  50 in total

1.  A controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of a calcium channel blocker on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D Waters; J Lespérance; M Francetich; D Causey; P Théroux; Y K Chiang; G Hudon; L Lemarbre; M Reitman; M Joyal
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative Group.

Authors:  L Liu; J G Wang; L Gong; G Liu; J A Staessen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes and systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J Tuomilehto; D Rastenyte; W H Birkenhäger; L Thijs; R Antikainen; C J Bulpitt; A E Fletcher; F Forette; A Goldhaber; P Palatini; C Sarti; R Fagard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-12

5.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

Authors:  M J Brown; C R Palmer; A Castaigne; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; T Rosenthal; L M Ruilope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effect of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril on mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the GISSI-3 study.

Authors:  G Zuanetti; R Latini; A P Maggioni; M Franzosi; L Santoro; G Tognoni
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Therapeutic benefits of ACE inhibitors and other antihypertensive drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  M Pahor; B M Psaty; M H Alderman; W B Applegate; J D Williamson; C D Furberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; R P Bain; R D Rohde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors:  B J Materson; D J Reda; W C Cushman; B M Massie; E D Freis; M S Kochar; R J Hamburger; C Fye; R Lakshman; J Gottdiener
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.