Literature DB >> 14564132

Quality of life measured in a practice-based hypertension trial of an angiotensin receptor blocker.

Michael A Weber1, George L Bakris, Joel M Neutel, Giora Davidai, Thomas D Giles.   

Abstract

Effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment depends not only on drugs that avoid or minimize symptomatic side effects but also on therapy that has a positive effect on quality of life. This study assessed the effect on quality of life of a contemporary agent (an angiotensin receptor blocker) and evaluated the validity and practicality of using a quality-of-life instrument in the practice-based setting. A total of 2716 hypertensive patients, either untreated or on single-agent therapy, were started on or switched to 40 mg telmisartan for 6 weeks; in patients whose blood pressures remained above 130/85 mm Hg after 2 weeks, the dose was increased to 80 mg for the remaining 4 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was measured by patient self-administration of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (GWBI) at baseline and at the end of the study. Sixty-eight percent (n=1858) of patients treated with telmisartan fully completed both GWBI tests; the test score increased by 5.2+/-0.3 (p<0.0001) from 77.7+/-0.4. This improvement was observed across all six emotional and health subscales of the GWBI. White and black patients, those aged <65 or >/=65 years, and men and women had similar increases, though the baseline value in women was sharply lower (p<0.001) than in men. The GWBI rose more in patients whose blood pressure was controlled by treatment (<140/90 mm Hg) than in noncontrolled patients (6.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.0001); for all patients the decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures produced by telmisartan correlated significantly (p<0.001 for each) with the increases in the GWBI scores. Controlling blood pressure appears to be an important element in improving subjective health perceptions of hypertensive patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14564132      PMCID: PMC8101801          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.02671.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  20 in total

1.  The effect of lowering blood pressure on quality of life.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Four-Year persistence patterns among patients initiating therapy with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus other artihypertensive drug classes.

Authors:  P R Conlin; W C Gerth; J Fox; J B Roehm; S J Boccuzzi
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

Authors:  J B McGill; P A Reilly
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 5.  Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  D H Peters; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy.

Authors:  B S Bloom
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

Authors:  B M Brenner; M E Cooper; D de Zeeuw; W F Keane; W E Mitch; H H Parving; G Remuzzi; S M Snapinn; Z Zhang; S Shahinfar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.

Authors:  V L Burt; P Whelton; E J Roccella; C Brown; J A Cutler; M Higgins; M J Horan; D Labarthe
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Double-blind, parallel, comparative study on quality of life during treatment with amlodipine or enalapril in mild or moderate hypertensive patients: a multicentre study.

Authors:  P Omvik; E Thaulow; O B Herland; I Eide; R Midha; R R Turner
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Angiotensin II-receptor antagonist in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Giuliano Tocci; Erika Pagannone
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Association of PPAR-γ2 and β3-AR Polymorphisms With Postmenopausal Hypertension.

Authors:  Bogna Grygiel-Górniak; Elżbieta Kaczmarek; Maria Mosor; Juliusz Przysławski; Jerzy Nowak
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 3.  Dispelling the myth of "aggressive" antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Ofili
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  The human side of failed hypertension treatment.

Authors:  Michael A Weber; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.