Literature DB >> 14563796

Effect of bone porosity on the mechanical integrity of the bone-cement interface.

Jove Graham1, Michael Ries, Lisa Pruitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteopenia is one factor that may influence the decision about the type of implant fixation to use in total hip arthroplasty. However, clinical studies generally do not associate the outcome of an arthroplasty with the degree of osteopenia. The mechanical integrity of the cement fixation of an implant may be affected by the relative degree of osteopenia, which could account for some of the variable long-term results after total hip arthroplasty performed with cement. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of bone porosity, trabecular orientation, cement pressure, and cement penetration depth on fracture toughness at the bone-cement interface.
METHODS: Trabecular bone from the proximal part of bovine femora was used with a single brand of commercial acrylic bone cement to form compact-tension interface specimens representing a range of bone porosities, orientations, and cement pressures within a clinically achievable range. All specimens were loaded to failure with use of a servohydraulic testing machine, and fracture toughness at the interface was calculated. After testing, images of a representative sample of specimens were made with use of computed tomography to measure the penetration depth of the cement into the bone.
RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between fracture toughness and bone porosity, trabecular orientation, and cement pressure, with bone porosity having the strongest effect (p < 0.000015). Examination of the computed tomographic images also showed a significant correlation between fracture toughness and maximum cement penetration depth (p < 0.033), as well as significant partial correlations between maximum and mean penetration depth and bone porosity (p < 0.0037 and p < 0.0028).
CONCLUSION: The fracture resistance of the bone-cement interface is greatly improved when the ability of the cement to flow into the intertrabecular spaces is enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14563796     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Richard J Cleary; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Material Mismatch Effect on the Fracture of a Bone-Composite Cement Interface.

Authors:  M Khandaker; S Tarantini
Journal:  Adv Mater Sci Appl       Date:  2012-12-01

3.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Primary arthroplasty for management of osteoporotic fractures about the knee.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Micro and nano MgO particles for the improvement of fracture toughness of bone-cement interfaces.

Authors:  Morshed Khandaker; Yanling Li; Tracy Morris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Frequency-dependent enhancement of bone formation in murine tibiae and femora with knee loading.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Shigeo M Tanaka; Qiwei Sun; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Fatigue in cemented acetabular replacements.

Authors:  J Tong; N P Zant; J-Y Wang; P Heaton-Adegbile; J G Hussell
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.186

8.  In vitro fatigue failure of cemented acetabular replacements: a hip simulator study.

Authors:  N P Zant; P Heaton-Adegbile; J G Hussell; J Tong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Comparison of flanged and unflanged acetabular cup design. An experimental study using ceramic and cadaveric acetabuli.

Authors:  Mette Ørskov; Saba Abdulghani; Ian McCarthy; Kjeld Søballe; Gunnar Flivik
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Radiofrequency-targeted vertebral augmentation versus traditional balloon kyphoplasty: radiographic and morphologic outcomes of an ex vivo biomechanical pilot study.

Authors:  Brian E Dalton; Andrew C Kohm; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block; Robert D Poser
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.