Literature DB >> 14562060

Coping with peer rejection.

.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14562060     DOI： 10.1038/425645a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  The fate of triaged and rejected manuscripts.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Daniela Amodeo; Angel Argiles; Mustafa Arici; Graziella D'arrigo; Pieter Evenepoel; Danilo Fliser; Jonathan Fox; Loreto Gesualdo; Michel Jadoul; Markus Ketteler; Jolanta Malyszko; Ziad Massy; Gert Mayer; Alberto Ortiz; Mehmet Sever; Raymond Vanholder; Caroline Vinck; Christopher Wanner; Andrzej Więcek
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  On rejection.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: an issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money.

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping.

Authors:  Kyle Siler; Kirby Lee; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Publications and rejections.

Authors:  Henk ten Have; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-05

6.  Calling a spade a spade… why editors are uncomfortable to say it as it is.

Authors:  B Gitanjali
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2012-01

Review 7.  Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.867
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.