Literature DB >> 14561410

Effects of low-spatial frequency components of fearful faces on fusiform cortex activity.

Joel S Winston1, Patrik Vuilleumier, Raymond J Dolan.   

Abstract

Emotive faces elicit neural responses even when they are not consciously perceived. We used faces hybridized from spatial frequency-filtered individual stimuli to study processing of facial emotion. Employing event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show enhanced fusiform cortex responses to hybrid faces containing fearful expressions when such emotional cues are present in the low-spatial frequency (LSF) range. Critically, this effect is independent of whether subjects use LSF or high-spatial frequency (HSF) information to make gender judgments on the hybridized faces. The magnitude of this fusiform enhancement predicts behavioral slowing in response times when participants report HSF information of the hybrid stimulus in the presence of fear in the unreported LSF components. Thus, emotional modulation of a face-responsive region of fusiform is driven by the low-frequency components of the stimulus, an effect independent of subjects' reported perception but evident in an incidental measure of behavioral performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561410     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  49 in total

1.  The primacy of negative interpretations when resolving the valence of ambiguous facial expressions.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09

2.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping.

Authors:  Gilles Pourtois; Elise S Dan; Didier Grandjean; David Sander; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices.

Authors:  B de Gelder; J S Morris; R J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing: evidence from affective blindsight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jacob Jolij; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Coarse threat images reveal theta oscillations in the amygdala: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Frances A Maratos; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Gina Rippon; Carl Senior
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Emotional modulation of body-selective visual areas.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Anthony P Atkinson; Frederic Andersson; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  The Diagnosticity of Color for Emotional Objects.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Jasmine Radue; Joanna Trask; Kristin Huskamp; Daniel Kersten; Chad J Marsolek
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2013-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.