Literature DB >> 14561354

High resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

T G Gleeson1, P D Lacy, M Bresnihan, R Gaffney, P Brennan, L Viani.   

Abstract

Optimal imaging protocols for cochlear implantation have yet to be determined. Pre-operative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance image (MRI) scans are used to assess cochlear anatomy and patency, to delineate surgical access, and to aid in choice of side for implantation. However, opinion still differs as to which modality provides more information in pre-operative assessment, or if, indeed, a combination of the two is superior. The first 88 patients on the Irish National Cochlear Implant Programme (NCIP) were retrospectively studied to determine the accuracy of pre-operative CT and MRI in predicting abnormalities at the time of surgery. Correlation with surgical findings was determined in three separate groups of patients (those who had CT only, those who had MRI only, and those who had both CT and MRI performed). Of the 24 patients that had both CT and MRI performed, both modalities had a 79 per cent correlation with surgical findings. CT and MRI reports concurred in 75 per cent of cases. Specificity and negative predictive value were high (86 per cent and 90 per cent, respectively). CT alone (47 cases) correlated with surgery in 39 cases (83 per cent); MRI alone (17 cases) correlated in 15 cases (88 per cent). The findings of this study suggest that CT and MRI are effective at predicting normal inner ear anatomy, and thus at predicting the patient and the cochlea most suitable for implantation. Both modalities are useful in determining the side of implantation, thus avoiding potential surgical difficulties in cases of unilateral abnormalities. There was no significant difference between the ability of MRI and CT to detect abnormalities at the time of surgery. In this series the combination of CT and MRI has not been shown to be superior to either modality used alone, although anecdotal evidence to the contrary was noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561354     DOI: 10.1258/002221503322334495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  9 in total

1.  In vivo imaging of mammalian cochlear blood flow using fluorescence microendoscopy.

Authors:  Ashkan Monfared; Nikolas H Blevins; Eunice L M Cheung; Juergen C Jung; Gerald Popelka; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Application of Curved MPR Algorithm to High Resolution 3 Dimensional T2 Weighted CISS Images for Virtual Uncoiling of Membranous Cochlea as an Aid for Cochlear Morphometry.

Authors:  Joish Upendra Kumar; Y Kavitha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Ultrahigh-resolution CT scan of the temporal bone.

Authors:  Koji Yamashita; Akio Hiwatashi; Osamu Togao; Kazufumi Kikuchi; Nozomu Matsumoto; Daichi Momosaka; Hiroshi Nakatake; Yuki Sakai; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Radiological Anatomy of Inner Ear Malformation in Hearing Impaired Children and it's Correlation with Hearing Loss: A Hospital Based Observational Study.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar; Baidya Nath Majhi; Krishna Kumar Yadav; S P Agrawal; Ragini Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-18

5.  High-Resolution CT Imaging of the Temporal Bone: A Cadaveric Specimen Study.

Authors:  Nancy Pham; Osama Raslan; Edward B Strong; John Boone; Arthur Dublin; Shuai Chen; Lotfi Hacein-Bey
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  The Diagnostic Efficacy of MRI in the Evaluation of the Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct in Children with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Fatma Ceren Sarıoğlu; Aslı Çakır Çetin; Handan Güleryüz; Enis Alpin Güneri
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-28

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with meningitis induced hearing loss.

Authors:  J Beijen; J Casselman; F Joosten; T Stover; A Aschendorff; A Zarowski; H Becker; E Mylanus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation.

Authors:  Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima Júnior; Marina David Rocha; Priscilla Vargas Walsh; Camila André Antunes; Clara Maria Dias Ferreira Calhau
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 May-Jun

9.  A method for measuring the length of the cochlea through magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Fernando Pochini Sobrinho; Paulo Roberto Lazarini; Hea Jung Yoo; Luiz de Abreu Júnior; Altino de Sá Meira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.