Literature DB >> 14561264

False-positive result and reattendance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

A M Chiarelli1, V Moravan, E Halapy, V Majpruz, V Mai, R K Tatla.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between initial screen result and returning for a second screen in an organised breast screening programme for women with a biennial screening recommendation.
SETTING: Women who attended the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 140723 Ontario women aged 50 years and older who had an initial screen at the OBSP between 1 July 1990 and 31 December 1995 and were followed until 30 June 1998. Rescreening rates at 36 months and risk ratio estimates were calculated using survival methods. Age of women, year of screen, region (within Ontario) and initial screen result were compared. For initial screen results, returning for a second screen was examined by integration of screening centre with an assessment programme and by modality of referral.
RESULTS: Women with a false-positive result were less likely to return for a second screen as were women aged 70 and older and those living in regions of Ontario with fewer OBSP screening centres. However, there were minimal differences in reattendance behaviour by initial screen result for women screened at the OBSP centre with an assessment programme.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of breast screening and assessment services improved reattendance of women with false-positive screen results within an organised screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14561264     DOI: 10.1177/096914130301000306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  6 in total

1.  Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Firas M Dabbous; Therese A Dolecek; Michael L Berbaum; Sarah M Friedewald; Wm Thomas Summerfelt; Kent Hoskins; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Influence of false-positive mammography results on subsequent screening: do physician recommendations buffer negative effects?

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling; Jo Anne Earp; Erica S Breslau; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Re-attendance after false-positive screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  W Setz-Pels; L E M Duijm; J W Coebergh; M Rutten; J Nederend; A C Voogd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program after a false-positive result in the Local Health Authority of Bologna (Italy).

Authors:  Lorena Squillace; Lorenzo Pizzi; Flavia Rallo; Carmen Bazzani; Gianni Saguatti; Francesca Mezzetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Factors associated with attendance at screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Mottram; Wendy Lynn Knerr; Daniel Gallacher; Hannah Fraser; Lena Al-Khudairy; Abimbola Ayorinde; Sian Williamson; Chidozie Nduka; Olalekan A Uthman; Samantha Johnson; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Christopher Stinton; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The "Sweet Spot" Revisited: Optimal Recall Rates for Cancer Detection With 2D and 3D Digital Screening Mammography in the Metro Chicago Breast Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Anne Marie Murphy; Qiong Qiu; Therese A Dolecek; Katherine Tossas; Yanyang Liu; Nila H Alsheik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.959

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.