OBJECTIVES: To undertake a prescreening evaluation of a new brush-based faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin, relative to a traditional spatula-sampling immunochemical test. SETTING: Patients aged between 24 and 90 years, scheduled to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy in two major urban hospitals, for a range of clinical indications. DESIGN: Patients sampled three stools using a spatula for the reference FlexSure OBT test and two stools using a brush for the InSure test; order of sampling was randomised. Faecal haemoglobin was quantified by a modified InSure in a subset of patients to determine whether brush-sampling allowed discrimination between groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity for cancer or adenoma; false-positive rate in normals. Faecal haemoglobin levels. Preference for sampling method. RESULTS: InSure and FlexSure OBT did not differ in their sensitivities for cancer (27/36, 75% vs 29/36, 80.5%, respectively), adenomas >or= 10 mm (12/29, 41.4% vs 13/29, 44.8%) or adenomas <10 mm (each 8/56, 14.3%). Likewise, false-positive rates in normals were similar: 4/179 (2.2%) and 5/179 (2.8%) respectively (specificities of 97.8% and 97.2%, respectively). Levels of faecal haemoglobin were highest in those with cancers; those with adenomas had intermediate levels which were also significantly higher than those in normals. The brush sampling method was preferred by 38/46 (82.6%), while 4/46 (8.7%) preferred the spatula (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: InSure is as sensitive and specific as FlexSure OBT for faecal haemoglobin. The novel stool-sampling method of InSure allows discrimination between normals and classes of neoplasia, and is highly preferred. The brush-sampling faecal immunochemical test InSure should now be evaluated in a screening population.
OBJECTIVES: To undertake a prescreening evaluation of a new brush-based faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin, relative to a traditional spatula-sampling immunochemical test. SETTING:Patients aged between 24 and 90 years, scheduled to undergo diagnostic colonoscopy in two major urban hospitals, for a range of clinical indications. DESIGN:Patients sampled three stools using a spatula for the reference FlexSure OBT test and two stools using a brush for the InSure test; order of sampling was randomised. Faecal haemoglobin was quantified by a modified InSure in a subset of patients to determine whether brush-sampling allowed discrimination between groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity for cancer or adenoma; false-positive rate in normals. Faecal haemoglobin levels. Preference for sampling method. RESULTS: InSure and FlexSure OBT did not differ in their sensitivities for cancer (27/36, 75% vs 29/36, 80.5%, respectively), adenomas >or= 10 mm (12/29, 41.4% vs 13/29, 44.8%) or adenomas <10 mm (each 8/56, 14.3%). Likewise, false-positive rates in normals were similar: 4/179 (2.2%) and 5/179 (2.8%) respectively (specificities of 97.8% and 97.2%, respectively). Levels of faecal haemoglobin were highest in those with cancers; those with adenomas had intermediate levels which were also significantly higher than those in normals. The brush sampling method was preferred by 38/46 (82.6%), while 4/46 (8.7%) preferred the spatula (p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: InSure is as sensitive and specific as FlexSure OBT for faecal haemoglobin. The novel stool-sampling method of InSure allows discrimination between normals and classes of neoplasia, and is highly preferred. The brush-sampling faecal immunochemical test InSure should now be evaluated in a screening population.
Authors: Diana Redwood; Ellen Provost; Elvin Asay; Diana Roberts; Donald Haverkamp; David Perdue; Michael G Bruce; Frank Sacco; David Espey Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 2.830