Literature DB >> 14560424

The prevalence of corporate funding in adult lower extremity research and its correlation with reported results.

Kace A Ezzet1.   

Abstract

The author reviewed 603 consecutive articles and scientific presentations pertaining to adult lower extremity orthopedic research from 2 major American orthopedic journals and 2 major American orthopedic meetings. The prevalence of commercial funding in these studies was 50%. Clinical studies of total hip arthroplasty implants by American investigators were commercially sponsored in 75% of studies. Commercially funded hip research reported positive outcomes in 93% of studies, whereas independently funded researchers reported good results in only 37%. Funded clinical studies of total knee arthroplasty implants yielded good results in 75%; this is in contrast to the findings of independently funded investigators, who reported positive conclusions in only 20% of studies. Investigators receiving royalties reported no negative outcomes related to the respective devices. The source of research funding was strongly correlated with reported outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560424     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00289-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  [Industry sponsoring and the results of research into accident surgery].

Authors:  D Stengel; A Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Role of technology assessment in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Charles Turkelson; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Industry and evidence-based medicine: Believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature.

Authors:  Chris S Bailey; Michael G Fehlings; Y Raja Rampersaud; Hamilton Hall; Eugene K Wai; Charles G Fisher
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: study outcomes as a function of risk of bias, conflicts of interest, and industrial sponsorship.

Authors:  Marian S Wettstein; Clinsy Pazhepurackel; Aline S Neumann; Dixon T S Woon; Jaime O Herrera-Caceres; Marko Kozomara; Cédric Poyet; Tullio Sulser; Girish S Kulkarni; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Ethical considerations of authorship.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Scott D Boden
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-09-01

6.  Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study.

Authors:  Pascal Probst; Kathrin Grummich; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-27

7.  Trends in Publication and Levels of Evidence in Foot & Ankle International From 2000 to 2015.

Authors:  Matthew Griffith; Edward Han; Joshua Hattaway; Jeannie Huh
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-07-28

8.  Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?

Authors:  Erik A Hasenboehler; Imran K Choudhry; Justin T Newman; Wade R Smith; Bruce H Ziran; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2007-11-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.