Literature DB >> 14560086

Three-dimensional analysis of the movement of lumbar spinal nerve roots in nonsimulated and simulated adhesive conditions.

Hiroshi Miyamoto1, Genevieve A Dumas, Urs P Wyss, Leif Ryd.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical analysis of the movement of the lumbar spinal nerve roots (NRs).
OBJECTIVES: The characteristics of the movement of lumbar spinal NRs corresponding to the change of posture were three-dimensionally analyzed in nonsimulated and simulated adhesion conditions using a porcine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a paucity of data on the movement of NRs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty two NRs of four pig cadavers were investigated. (study 1) Two tantalum beads were sutured on respective NRs from L3 to L6. Five beads were put into each bony structure as reference points. The porcine body was put on the cage designed for three-dimensional radiostereometric analysis. Two oblique radiographs were simultaneously taken at flexion, neutral, and extension. (study 2) After study 1, either L4 NR was ligated onto the adjacent bone to mimic monoradicular adhesion. Radiographs were taken in the same manner. The movements of the beads on NRs relative to immobile standard points in each vertebra were analyzed.
RESULTS: The movement of NRs was characterized as a combination of stretching/slackening and pendulum motion. The distance that NRs were stretched/slackened, the excursion, and the angles that NRs moved were: 0.39 +/- 0.29 mm, 1.81 +/- 0.63 mm, and 10.46 +/- 5.93 degrees (in nonadhesion), and 0.30 +/- 0.20 mm, 1.02 +/- 0.50 mm, and 7.13 +/- 3.79 degrees (in simulated adhesion), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Adhesion might play a part in the pathogenesis of lumbar spinal disorders because mechanical irritation secondary to stretching/slackening and pendulum motion might be concentrated at the distal part of NRs, adjacent to adhesion site, which has less cerebrospinal fluid and is close to dorsal root ganglion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14560086     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000085324.46051.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  2 in total

1.  Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural dry needling for lumbar spinal stenosis using a specially designed needle.

Authors:  Kang Ahn; Hyung-Joon Jhun; Tae-Kyun Lim; Yong-Seung Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Six Revision Surgeries for Massive Epidural Fibrosis with Recurrent Pain and Weakness in the Left Lower Extremity.

Authors:  Ho Yong Choi; Dae Jean Jo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.