Literature DB >> 1455934

Evaluation of diagnostic tests using relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the differential positive rate. An example using the total serum bile acid concentration and the alanine aminotransferase activity in the diagnosis of canine hepatobiliary diseases.

A L Jensen1, J S Poulsen.   

Abstract

The value of a diagnostic test depends on most cases on its ability to discriminate between patients with and without a certain disease. One way of evaluating a diagnostic test is to use the relative operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) and the differential positive rate (DPR). The ROC curve displays the relationship between the true positive ratio and the false positive ratio for a range of cutoff values and it can be used to compare various diagnostic tests under equivalent conditions (equal true positive ratios or false positive ratios) and over the entire range of cutoff values. The DPR is the difference between the true positive ratio and the false positive ratio at various cutoff values and it can be used to obtain the cutoff value associated with the highest sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this study was to describe the evaluation and comparison of diagnostic tests using ROC curves and DPR. Eventually, the positive and negative predictive values were used to assess the differences between the sensitivity and specificity obtained when the upper limit of the reference interval, or the optimal cutoff value indicated by the DPR, was used as cutoff value. To illustrate the methods, the 2 h post-prandial total serum bile acid concentration (PSBA) and the alanine aminotransferase activity (ALAT) in the diagnosis of primary or secondary hepatobiliary diseases in dogs were used. The ROC curves showed, as expected from previous studies, that PSBA was superior to ALAT in diagnosing dogs with hepatobiliary diseases. Using DPR, the optimal cutoff value for PSBA was suggested to be 15.48 mumol/l. Compared to the traditionally used cutoff value of 22.24 mumol/l, no decisive difference in the positive predictive values were observed. However, the cutoff value of 15.48 mumol/l appeared to produce higher negative predictive values compared to a cutoff value of 22.24 mumol/l. Seemingly, ROC curves and DPR are simple methods useful to the evaluation of diagnostic tests and due to the simplicity, there seems to be a great potential for these methods in the evaluation of diagnostic tests in veterinary medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1455934     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0442.1992.tb00231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Veterinarmed A        ISSN: 0514-7158


  7 in total

1.  Testing of bulk tank milk for Salmonella Dublin infection in Danish dairy herds.

Authors:  A Wedderkopp; U Strøger; V Bitsch; P Lind
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Evaluation of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detecting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Dublin antibodies in bulk milk.

Authors:  J Veling; F G van Zijderveld; A M van Zijderveld-van Bemmel; Y H Schukken; H W Barkema
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-11

3.  Comparison of Diagnostic Performance and Confidence between Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Scan and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Plus Abdomen Ultrasound for Hepatic Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Noh; Su Joa Ahn; Sang Yu Nam; Young Rock Jang; Yong Soon Chun; Heung Kyu Park; Seung Joon Choi; Hye Young Choi; Jeong Ho Kim
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Evaluation of an O antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for screening of milk samples for Salmonella dublin infection in dairy herds.

Authors:  J Hoorfar; P Lind; V Bitsch
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Various protein and albumin corrections of the serum fructosamine concentration in the diagnosis of canine diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A L Jensen
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Diagnostic and predictive capability of routine laboratory tests for the diagnosis and staging of equine inflammatory disease.

Authors:  E H Hooijberg; R van den Hoven; A Tichy; I Schwendenwein
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Comparison of different tests to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis.

Authors:  Katrin Hartmann; Christina Binder; Johannes Hirschberger; Dana Cole; Manfred Reinacher; Simone Schroo; Jens Frost; Herman Egberink; Hans Lutz; Walter Hermanns
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.