Literature DB >> 14559318

Bedside placement of small bowel feeding tubes in hospitalized patients: a new role for the dietitian.

Gail Cresci1, Robert Martindale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of enteral nutrition when compared with parenteral nutrition are well established. However, provision of enteral nutrition may not occur for several reasons, including lack of optimal feeding access. Gastric feeding is easier to initiate, but many hospitalized patients are intolerant to gastric feeding, although they can tolerate small bowel feeding. Many institutions rely on costly methods for placing small bowel feeding tubes. Our goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hospital-developed protocol for bedside-blind placement of postpyloric feeding tubes.
METHODS: The Surgical Nutrition Service established a protocol for bedside placement of small bowel feeding tubes. The protocol uses a 10- or 12-French, 110-cm stylet containing the feeding tube; 10 mg of intravenous metoclopramide; gradual tube advancement followed by air injection and auscultation; and an abdominal radiograph for tube position confirmation. In a prospective manner, consults received by the surgical nutrition dietitian for feeding tube placements were followed consecutively for a 10-mo period. The registered dietitian recorded the number of radiograph examinations, the final tube position, and the time it took to achieve tube placement.
RESULTS: Because all consults were included, feeding tube placements occurred in surgical and medical patients in the intensive care unit and on the ward. Of the 135 tube placements performed, 129 (95%) were successfully placed postpylorically, with 84% (114 of 135) placed at or beyond D3. Average time for tube placement was 28 min (10 to 90 min). One radiograph was required for 92% of the placements; eight of 135 (6%) required two radiographs. No acute complications were associated with the tube placements.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients can receive timely enteral feeding with a cost-effective feeding tube placement protocol. The protocol is easy to implement and can be taught to appropriate medical team members through proper training and certification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14559318     DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(03)00163-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  4 in total

1.  Blind bedside insertion of small bowel feeding tubes.

Authors:  S Duggan; S M Egan; N D Smyth; S M Feehan; N Breslin; K C Conlon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Electromagnetic Sensor-Guided Enteral Access Systems: A Literature Review.

Authors:  David Smithard; Nicholas A Barrett; David Hargroves; Stuart Elliot
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  The activities of a dietitian-led gastroenterology clinic using extended scope of practice.

Authors:  Dominique Ryan; Fiona Pelly; Elizabeth Purcell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Dutta; Ashish Goel; Richard Kirubakaran; Ashok Chacko; Prathap Tharyan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.