Literature DB >> 14558893

Is there an association between noise exposure and King Kopetzky Syndrome?

D Stephens1, F Zhao, V Kennedy.   

Abstract

The condition in which individuals with normal pure tone audiograms complain of hearing difficulties, especially in the presence of background noise, (normal pure tone audiograms), has had a number of different names. The present term King-Kopetzky Syndrome was coined by Hinchcliffe in 1992. This is a common condition reported in 5 - 10% of those attending clinics complaining of hearing problems. A dominant genetic aetiology has been found in a proportion of cases. It may be associated with minor peripheral or central auditory dysfunction, and frequently the individuals exhibit anxious or depressive personalities. We found no relationship with noise exposure in a series of patients compared with matched controls. Here we review the evidence for and against such an influence and present fresh data in an attempt to define the role of noise, if any, in the causation of this condition. Our final conclusion is that there is no clear association between KKS and noise exposure

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14558893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  7 in total

1.  Examining physiological and perceptual consequences of noise exposure.

Authors:  Aryn M Kamerer; Judy G Kopun; Sara E Fultz; Carissa Allen; Stephen T Neely; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  When a normal hearing test is just the beginning.

Authors:  Veronica Kennedy; Claire Wilson; Dafydd Stephens
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 18.000

3.  Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure.

Authors:  Hannah Guest; Kevin J Munro; Garreth Prendergast; Rebecca E Millman; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.

Authors:  Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Antonio Gilardi; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Perceptual consequences of "hidden" hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Daphne Barker; Garreth Prendergast
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Threshold Equalizing Noise Test Reveals Suprathreshold Loss of Hearing Function, Even in the "Normal" Audiogram Range.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Emanuele Perugia; Warren Bakay; Melanie Lough; Helen Whiston; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Brian B Monson; David R Moore; Sumitrajit Dhar; Beverly A Wright; Kevin J Munro; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Chelsea M Blankenship; Samantha M Stiepan; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.