Literature DB >> 14557986

Logistic regression of family data from retrospective study designs.

Alice S Whittemore1, Jerry Halpern.   

Abstract

We wish to study the effects of genetic and environmental factors on disease risk, using data from families ascertained because they contain multiple cases of the disease. To do so, we must account for the way participants were ascertained, and for within-family correlations in both disease occurrences and covariates. We model the joint probability distribution of the covariates of ascertained family members, given family disease occurrence and pedigree structure. We describe two such covariate models: the random effects model and the marginal model. Both models assume a logistic form for the distribution of one person's covariates that involves a vector beta of regression parameters. The components of beta in the two models have different interpretations, and they differ in magnitude when the covariates are correlated within families. We describe ascertainment assumptions needed to estimate consistently the parameters beta(RE) in the random effects model and the parameters beta(M) in the marginal model. Under the ascertainment assumptions for the random effects model, we show that conditional logistic regression (CLR) of matched family data gives a consistent estimate beta(RE) for beta(RE) and a consistent estimate for the covariance matrix of beta(RE). Under the ascertainment assumptions for the marginal model, we show that unconditional logistic regression (ULR) gives a consistent estimate for beta(M), and we give a consistent estimator for its covariance matrix. The random effects/CLR approach is simple to use and to interpret, but it can use data only from families containing both affected and unaffected members. The marginal/ULR approach uses data from all individuals, but its variance estimates require special computations. A C program to compute these variance estimates is available at http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HRP/epidemiology. We illustrate these pros and cons by application to data on the effects of parity on ovarian cancer risk in mother/daughter pairs, and use simulations to study the performance of the estimates. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557986     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.10267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  8 in total

1.  Smoking and risk of breast cancer in carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 aged less than 50 years.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  SEMIPARAMETRIC TRANSFORMATION MODELS WITH MULTILEVEL RANDOM EFFECTS FOR CORRELATED DISEASE ONSET IN FAMILIES.

Authors:  Baosheng Liang; Yuanjia Wang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.261

3.  Estimating gene penetrance from family data.

Authors:  Gail Gong; Nathan Hannon; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Roger L Milne; Esther M John; Julia A Knight; Gillian S Dite; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Carmel Apicella; Dee W West; Irene L Andrulis; Alice S Whittemore; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Edwin S Iversen; Tara Friebel; Dianne Finkelstein; Barbara L Weber; Andrea Eisen; Leif E Peterson; Joellen M Schildkraut; Claudine Isaacs; Beth N Peshkin; Camille Corio; Leoni Leondaridis; Gail Tomlinson; Debra Dutson; Rich Kerber; Christopher I Amos; Louise C Strong; Donald A Berry; David M Euhus; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Analysis of familial aggregation studies with complex ascertainment schemes.

Authors:  Abigail G Matthews; Dianne M Finkelstein; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Esther M John; John L Hopper; Jeanne C Beck; Julia A Knight; Susan L Neuhausen; Ruby T Senie; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Norman Boyd; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Frances P O'Malley; Regina M Santella; Melissa C Southey; Vickie L Venne; Deon J Venter; Dee W West; Alice S Whittemore; Daniela Seminara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Familial aggregation and heritability of type 1 diabetes mellitus and coaggregation of chronic diseases in affected families.

Authors:  Chang-Fu Kuo; I-Jun Chou; Matthew J Grainge; Shue-Fen Luo; Lai-Chu See; Kuang-Hui Yu; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty; Ana M Valdes
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.