Literature DB >> 14557888

Significance of CA 125 serum level in discrimination between benign and malignant masses in the pelvis.

Miodrag Milojkovic1, Zlatko Hrgovic, Igor Hrgovic, Walter Jonat, Nicolai Maass, Damir Buković.   

Abstract

AIM: Our aim was to confirm that preoperative CA 125 serum level can be useful for discrimination between benign and malignant masses in the pelvis.
METHODS: Preoperative CA 125 serum level was analyzed retrospectively in 121 patients who had surgery because of a malignant ovarian tumor and in 91 patients with benign masses in the pelvis. The cutoff serum level CA 125 between benign and malignant masses in the pelvis was 35 and 65 IU/ml.
RESULTS: Of those patients with a malignant ovarian tumor, 65.3% had menopause whereas only 31.5% of those with a benign tumor did so. The average age of the patients with a malignant tumor was 54.2 years and of those with a benign tumor 46.8 years. The preoperative CA 125 serum level was higher than 35 IU/ml in 80.2% and higher than 65 IU/ml in 72.7% of all analyzed patients with a malignant tumor, whereas it was 23.9% and 9.8% respectively in patients with a benign mass. In early stage ovarian cancer disease (borderline stage, I/II) the preoperative CA 125 serum level was higher than 35 IU/ml in 67.8% and in 52.5% higher than 65 IU/ml. In advanced stages (III/IV), it was higher than 35 and 65 IU/ml in 96.1%. After therapy the CA 125 serum level dropped below 35 IU/ml in 70.8% and after three chemotherapy courses in 78.1%. A CA 125 level less than 35 IU/ml was achieved by therapy in 84.2% patients with an early stage disease (I/II) and in 62.1% in advanced stages (III/IV). The calculated sensitivity was 80.2% and negative 74.5% (CA 125 higher than 35 IU/ml) and 72.7%, 90.2%, 90.7%, 71.6% respectively (CA 125 higher than 65 IU/ml).
CONCLUSION: . Preoperative determination of CA 125 is a very useful method to discriminate between benign and malignant masses in the pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557888     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-002-0411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  7 in total

1.  Metabolomics of biomarker discovery in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Onur Turkoglu; Amna Zeb; Stewart Graham; Thomas Szyperski; J Brian Szender; Kunle Odunsi; Ray Bahado-Singh
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Selected adnexal cystic masses in postmenopausal women can be safely managed by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Lee; Chul Jung Kim; Ji Eun Lee; Sun-Joo Lee; Byoung Gie Kim; Je-Ho Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Chang-Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Predisposing factors for predicting the therapeutic response of adenomyosis after uterine artery embolization: serum CA125 levels and accompanying endometriosis.

Authors:  Rui Zheng; Dan Zeng; Ting-Ting Wan; Wen-Bo Guo; Yan Guo; Ming-Juan Liu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  The Comparison of Pelvic Mass Score and Risk of Malignancy Index-3 in Discrimination of Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Aliya Isgandarova; Ayse Ender Yumru; Suat Karatas; Burcu Dincgez Cakmak; Betul Dundar; Ulku Ayse Turker
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  Usefulness of the HE4 biomarker as a second-line test in the assessment of suspicious ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Rafal Moszynski; Sebastian Szubert; Dariusz Szpurek; Slawomir Michalak; Joanna Krygowska; Stefan Sajdak
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Differential levels of L-homocysteic acid and lysophosphatidylcholine (16:0) in sera of patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Seung Cheol Kim; Min Kyung Kim; Yun Hwan Kim; Sun-A Ahn; Kyung-Hee Kim; Kun Kim; Won Ki Kim; Jun Hwa Lee; Jae Youl Cho; Byong Chul Yoo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.967

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.