Literature DB >> 1455744

Psychophysical and saccadic information about direction for briefly presented visual targets.

A P Aitsebaomo1, H E Bedell.   

Abstract

For saccades, the difference between desired and actual eye movement (constant error), as well as the variability in amplitude on repeated trials (variable error), presumably represent a combination of errors in processing target position (sensory error) and errors in execution (motor error). To examine whether the saccadic system uses the same information about target position as visual perception, subjects made saccades to and psychophysical judgments about the location of targets presented for 17-200 msec. Mean saccadic amplitude markedly decreased and inter-trial variability increased when saccadic targets were presented briefly and followed by a spatial mask. Judged target position (from psychophysical vernier and bisection tasks) also shifted to lesser eccentricities and was more variable. Although qualitatively alike, changes with duration in saccadic constant errors were larger than could be accounted for by the psychophysical results, suggesting similar but separate processing of position information for the saccadic and perceptual systems. Differences in the sizes of collicular receptive fields that preferentially respond to targets at short and long durations can account qualitatively for the observed changes in saccadic amplitude as well as the common occurrence of saccadic undershoots.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1455744     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90165-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Binocular Eye Movements Are Adapted to the Natural Environment.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Eye choice for acquisition of targets in alternating strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Martin Szinte; Bilge Sayim; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perceptual judgment and saccadic behavior in a spatial distortion with briefly presented stimuli.

Authors:  Sonja Stork; Jochen Müsseler; A H C van der Heijden
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-11

5.  Inter-Trial Correlations in Predictive-Saccade Endpoints: Fractal Scaling Reflects Differential Control along Task-Relevant and Orthogonal Directions.

Authors:  Pamela Federighi; Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.