Literature DB >> 14557428

Is glycosylated hemoglobin A1c a surrogate for metabolic syndrome in nondiabetic, first-degree relatives of African-American patients with type 2 diabetes?

Kwame Osei1, Scott Rhinesmith, Trudy Gaillard, Dara Schuster.   

Abstract

Glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb)A1c provides a practical assessment of long-term glycemic control in patients with diabetes. However, whether HbA1c has any clinical significance in metabolic syndrome (MS) in nondiabetic subjects remains debatable. Therefore, we examined the impact of different levels of HbA1c on insulin sensitivity (Si), non-insulin-dependent glucose disposal, and blood pressure (BP), as well as lipids and lipoproteins in nondiabetic, first-degree relatives of African-American patients with type 2 diabetes. The study consisted of 219 nondiabetic, first-degree relatives (offspring and siblings) of African-American patients with type 2 diabetes. To examine the metabolic impact of HbA1c in our population, HbA1c was divided into tertiles (normal range, 3.3-6.4%). The mean HbA1c was 4.7% (range, 3.3-4.8%, n = 74) for tertile 1, 5.4% (range, 4.9-5.6%, n = 73) for tertile 2, and 5.8% (range, 5.7-6.4%, n = 72) for tertile 3. Si and glucose effectiveness (Sg) were determined by the Bergman's minimal model method. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-insulin resistance and HOMA-beta-cell function were also estimated. BP, body compositional variables, and body fat distribution, as well as fasting serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, were determined in each subject. The mean age, body weight, body mass index, waist and hip circumference, and systolic and diastolic BPs were significantly (P < 0.02-0.001) greater in the subjects in tertile 3 than those in tertiles 1 and 2. The mean fasting serum glucose was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in tertile 3 (95.5 +/- 3.2 mg/dl) than in tertile 2 (83.0 +/- 2.7 mg/dl) and tertile 1 (78.8 +/- 1.5 mg/dl). Mean fasting serum insulin and c-peptide levels tended to be higher in tertile 3 subjects than in those in tertiles 1 and 2, but the mean differences did not reach statistical significance. The mean Si was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in the subjects in tertile 3 [1.66 +/- 0.2019 x 10(-4).min(-1)( micro U/ml)(-1)], when compared with those in tertile 1 [2.27 +/- 0.20 19 x 10(-4).min(-1)( micro U/ml)(-1)] and tertile 2 [2.61 +/- 0.19 x 10(-4).min(-1)( micro U/ml)(-1)]. The mean Sg was significantly (P < 0.02) lower in tertile 3 (1.95 +/- 0.12 x 10(-2).min(-1)), when compared with those of tertile 1 (2.27 +/- 0.10 x 10(-2).min(-1)) and tertile 2 (2.29 +/- 0.11 x 10(-2).min(-1)). In addition, the (HOMA)-insulin resistance was significantly (P < 0.01) higher in tertile 3 (3.62 +/- 0.26) than in tertile 1 (2.6 +/- 0.21) and tertile 2 (2.55 +/- 0.31) HbA1c. In contrast, HOMA-beta-cell function, was not different among tertiles 1, 2, and 3. Mean fasting serum triglycerides, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels also were not significantly different in subjects in tertile 3, when compared with those in tertiles 1 and 2. In summary, the present study demonstrates that the upper tertile HbA1c level (tertile 3) reflects some components of MS in the nondiabetic, obese, first-degree relatives of African-Americans who are genetically predisposed to type 2 diabetes. The metabolic abnormalities in the upper tertile 3 subjects included a reduced insulin action (Si) and reduced Sg, as well as elevated systolic and diastolic BPs, but not beta-cell secretion and lipids and lipoproteins. We conclude that the upper tertile of HbA1c should be considered as a major surrogate of MS in high-risk African-Americans who are genetically predisposed to type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557428     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  32 in total

1.  Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and biological 'wear and tear' in a nationally representative sample of US adults.

Authors:  Chloe E Bird; Teresa Seeman; José J Escarce; Ricardo Basurto-Dávila; Brian K Finch; Tamara Dubowitz; Melonie Heron; Lauren Hale; Sharon Stein Merkin; Margaret Weden; Nicole Lurie
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Education, income and ethnic differences in cumulative biological risk profiles in a national sample of US adults: NHANES III (1988-1994).

Authors:  Teresa Seeman; Sharon S Merkin; Eileen Crimmins; Brandon Koretz; Susan Charette; Arun Karlamangla
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Should haemoglobin A1C be used for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in Malawi?

Authors:  W P Nakanga; A Crampin; M Nyirenda
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.875

4.  Relationship between HbA(1)c and mortality in a Japanese population.

Authors:  S Nakanishi; M Yamada; N Hattori; G Suzuki
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Neighborhood context and social disparities in cumulative biological risk factors.

Authors:  Katherine E King; Jeffrey D Morenoff; James S House
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.312

6.  Stressful life events, sexual orientation, and cardiometabolic risk among young adults in the United States.

Authors:  Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Natalie Slopen; Katie A McLaughlin; Kate A McLaughlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Neighborhoods and cumulative biological risk profiles by race/ethnicity in a national sample of U.S. adults: NHANES III.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Ricardo Basurto-Dávila; Arun Karlamangla; Chloe E Bird; Nicole Lurie; Jose Escarce; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Educational differentials in US adult mortality: An examination of mediating factors.

Authors:  Richard G Rogers; Robert A Hummer; Bethany G Everett
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2012-09-13

9.  Effect of obesity and insulin resistance on diabetic control.

Authors:  Kumud Kale; D K Rawat
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2006-03

10.  A1C predicts type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in a population at risk: the community diabetes prevention project.

Authors:  Silmara Ao Leite; Robyn L Anderson; David M Kendall; Arlene M Monk; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.