Literature DB >> 14557215

Communitywide trends in the use and outcomes associated with beta-blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Helme Silvet1, Frederick Spencer, Jorge Yarzebski, Darleen Lessard, Joel M Gore, Robert J Goldberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits associated with beta-blocker therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), limited recent data are available describing the extent of use of this therapy and the associated hospital and long-term outcomes, particularly from the perspective of a population-based study. Data are also limited about the characteristics of patients with AMI who do not receive beta-blockers. This study examines more than 2 decades of trends in the use of beta-blockers in hospitalized patients with AMI.
METHODS: Communitywide study of 10,374 patients hospitalized with confirmed AMI in all metropolitan Worcester hospitals during 12 annual periods between 1975 and 1999.
RESULTS: There was a marked increase in the use of beta-blockers in hospitalized patients between 1975 (11%) and 1999 (82%). Older patients, women, and patients with comorbidities were significantly less likely to be treated with beta-blockers. After controlling for other prognostic factors, patients treated with beta-blockers were less likely to develop heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.63), cardiogenic shock (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54), and primary ventricular fibrillation (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08) and were less likely to die (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.22-0.29) during hospitalization than were patients who did not receive this therapy. Patients who used beta-blockers during hospitalization had significantly lower death rates after hospital discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study demonstrate encouraging trends in the use of beta-blockers in hospitalized patients with AMI and document the benefits to be gained from this treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557215     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.18.2175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  3 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Acute coronary syndromes in women: is treatment different? Should it be?

Authors:  Susan K Bennett; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Changes in practice patterns affecting in-hospital and post-discharge survival among ACS patients.

Authors:  Manfred Stommel; Ade Olomu; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; William Corser; Joseph C Gardiner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.