Literature DB >> 14557089

Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mCEX) in a medicine core clerkship.

Jennifer R Kogan1, Lisa M Bellini, Judy A Shea.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility, reliability and validity of the mCEX when used to evaluate medical students' clinical skills in a medicine core clerkship.
METHOD: In 2002, students were required to complete nine mCEX during their medicine clerkship. Mean mCEX scores were correlated with exam scores and course grades.
RESULTS: 89% of targeted mCEX were completed. The reproducibility coefficient for eight mCEX was.77. Mean mCEX scores were significantly correlated with exam scores (r =.22; p =.004), inpatient (r =.43; p <.0001), outpatient (r =.35; p <.0001), and final course grades (r =.19; p =.014).
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the feasibility, reproducibility, and validity of the mCEX in evaluating medicine clerkship students' clinical skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14557089     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200310001-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  21 in total

1.  Resident physician well-being and assessments of their knowledge and clinical performance.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; Darcy A Reed; Tait D Shanafelt; Colin P West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A randomized-controlled study of encounter cards to improve oral case presentation skills of medical students.

Authors:  Sarang Kim; Jennifer R Kogan; Lisa M Bellini; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Brief report: Use of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise in internal medicine core clerkships.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The reliability of in-training assessment when performance improvement is taken into account.

Authors:  Mirjam T van Lohuizen; Jan B M Kuks; Elisabeth A van Hell; A N Raat; Roy E Stewart; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 5.  The modern surgeon and competency assessment: are the workplace-based assessments evidence-based?

Authors:  K M Torsney; D M Cocker; A A P Slesser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Pilot of direct observation of clinical skills (DOCS) in a medicine clerkship: feasibility and relationship to clinical performance measures.

Authors:  Yoon Kang; Charles L Bardes; Linda M Gerber; Carol Storey-Johnson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2009-08-05

7.  The implementation of a mobile problem-specific electronic CEX for assessing directly observed student-patient encounters.

Authors:  Gary S Ferenchick; Jami Foreback; Basim Towfiq; Kevin Kavanaugh; David Solomon; Asad Mohmand
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-01-29

8.  Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: a literature review.

Authors:  E A M Pelgrim; A W M Kramer; H G A Mokkink; L van den Elsen; R P T M Grol; C P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.853

10.  Associations between resident physicians' publications and clinical performance during residency training.

Authors:  Luke A Seaburg; Amy T Wang; Colin P West; Darcy A Reed; Andrew J Halvorsen; Gregory Engstler; Amy S Oxentenko; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.