INTRODUCTION: Uterine artery embolization is a technique that has been recently proposed for the management of uterine myomas an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy. The results provided by the first published studies demonstrate a significant decrease in symptoms in 70-95% of cases. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness ratios for pelvic embolization and vaginal hysterectomy looked at from the hospital point of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two populations of patients were randomly selected from women undergoing pelvic embolization or vaginal hysterectomy. We retrospectively measured the cost at 6 months of the two types of procedure (costs of hospitalization, drugs, and complementary examinations) as well as the success of each of them at 6 months. The cost of the techniques themselves were measured prospectively on the basis of four procedures. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratios were 2320 Euros per success (mean cost 2134 Euros per effectiveness 92%) for embolization and 2789 Euros per success (mean cost 2789 Euros per effectiveness 100%) for hysterectomy. DISCUSSION: Pelvic embolization is more cost-effective than vaginal hysterectomy. The integration of the notion of quality of life with the notion of cost should permit a future study to reinforce interest in performing pelvic embolizations in the management of uterine myomas.
INTRODUCTION: Uterine artery embolization is a technique that has been recently proposed for the management of uterine myomas an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy. The results provided by the first published studies demonstrate a significant decrease in symptoms in 70-95% of cases. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness ratios for pelvic embolization and vaginal hysterectomy looked at from the hospital point of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two populations of patients were randomly selected from women undergoing pelvic embolization or vaginal hysterectomy. We retrospectively measured the cost at 6 months of the two types of procedure (costs of hospitalization, drugs, and complementary examinations) as well as the success of each of them at 6 months. The cost of the techniques themselves were measured prospectively on the basis of four procedures. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratios were 2320 Euros per success (mean cost 2134 Euros per effectiveness 92%) for embolization and 2789 Euros per success (mean cost 2789 Euros per effectiveness 100%) for hysterectomy. DISCUSSION: Pelvic embolization is more cost-effective than vaginal hysterectomy. The integration of the notion of quality of life with the notion of cost should permit a future study to reinforce interest in performing pelvic embolizations in the management of uterine myomas.