Literature DB >> 14556923

An open randomised trial of second-line endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. comparison of the aromatase inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole.

C Rose1, O Vtoraya, A Pluzanska, N Davidson, M Gershanovich, R Thomas, S Johnson, J J Caicedo, H Gervasio, G Manikhas, F Ben Ayed, S Burdette-Radoux, H A Chaudri-Ross, R Lang.   

Abstract

It was previously shown that letrozole (Femara) was significantly more potent than anastrozole (Arimidex) in inhibiting aromatase activity in vitro and in inhibiting total body aromatisation in patients with breast cancer. The objective of this study was to compare letrozole (2.5 mg per day) and anastrozole (1 mg per day) as endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anti-oestrogen. This randomised, multicentre and multinational open-label phase IIIb/IV study enrolled 713 patients. Treatment was for advanced breast cancer that had progressed either during anti-oestrogen therapy or within 12 months of completing that therapy. Patients had tumours that were either positive for oestrogen and/or progesterone receptors (48%) or of unknown receptor status (52%). The primary efficacy endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints included objective response, duration of response, rate and duration of overall clinical benefit (responses and long-term stable disease), time to treatment failure, and overall survival, as well as general safety. There was no difference between the treatment arms in TTP; median times were the same for both treatments. Letrozole was significantly superior to anastrozole in the overall response rate (ORR) (19.1% versus 12.3%, P=0.013), including in predefined subgroups (receptor status-unknown, and soft-tissue- and viscera-dominant site of disease). There were no significant differences between the treatment arms in the rate of clinical benefit, median duration of response, duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure or overall survival. Both agents were well tolerated and there were no significant differences in safety. These results support previous data documenting the greater aromatase-inhibiting activity of letrozole and indicate that advanced breast cancer is more responsive to letrozole than to anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14556923     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00630-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular safety profiles of aromatase inhibitors : a comparative review.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Joseph Gligorov
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Susanne Briest; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Progress in endocrine approaches to the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ifeyinwa Obiorah; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Twelve-Month Estrogen Levels in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Triptorelin Plus Exemestane or Tamoxifen in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT): The SOFT-EST Substudy.

Authors:  Meritxell Bellet; Kathryn P Gray; Prudence A Francis; István Láng; Eva Ciruelos; Ana Lluch; Miguel Angel Climent; Gustavo Catalán; Antoni Avella; Uriel Bohn; Antonio González-Martin; Roser Ferrer; Roberto Catalán; Analía Azaro; Agnita Rajasekaran; Josefa Morales; Josep Vázquez; Gini F Fleming; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: redrawing the lines.

Authors:  A Matutino; A A Joy; C Brezden-Masley; S Chia; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Endocrine therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Rodríguez Lajusticia; Miguel Martín Jiménez; Sara López-Tarruella Cobo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Current medical treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Franco Lumachi; Davide A Santeufemia; Stefano Mm Basso
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 8.  Optimal management of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mh Wong; N Pavlakis
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2011-05-02

9.  Prospective characterization of musculoskeletal symptoms in early stage breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Jon T Giles; Dennis Ang; Monika Mohan; Dina Dadabhoy; Jason Robarge; Jill Hayden; Suzanne Lemler; Karineh Shahverdi; Penny Powers; Lang Li; David Flockhart; Vered Stearns; Daniel F Hayes; Anna Maria Storniolo; Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Economic evaluation of fulvestrant as an extra step in the treatment sequence for ER-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Cameron; D R Camidge; J Oyee; M Hirsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.