Hassan N Sallam1, Sameh S Sadek. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. hnsallam@link.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies to evaluate abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer compared to the clinical touch method. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: Four studies performed in academic research centers in Barcelona, Vizcaya, Hong Kong, and Madrid. PATIENT(S): A total of 2,051 patients: 1,024 received ultrasound-guided embryo transfers and 1,027 received clinical touch method transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Fourteen studies were retrieved from the literature, but only four of them fitted our selection criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software with the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method and the fixed effect model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome measures were the incidences of ectopic pregnancies, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancies, and difficult transfers. RESULT(S): Compared to the clinical touch method, abdominal ultrasound-guided transfer significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate. There was no effect on the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage rate. CONCLSUION(S): Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer increases the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates significantly compared to the clinical touch method.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies to evaluate abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer compared to the clinical touch method. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SETTING: Four studies performed in academic research centers in Barcelona, Vizcaya, Hong Kong, and Madrid. PATIENT(S): A total of 2,051 patients: 1,024 received ultrasound-guided embryo transfers and 1,027 received clinical touch method transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Fourteen studies were retrieved from the literature, but only four of them fitted our selection criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software with the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method and the fixed effect model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome measures were the incidences of ectopic pregnancies, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancies, and difficult transfers. RESULT(S): Compared to the clinical touch method, abdominal ultrasound-guided transfer significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate. There was no effect on the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage rate. CONCLSUION(S): Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer increases the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates significantly compared to the clinical touch method.
Authors: Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.060