William M Buckett1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada. william.buckett@muhc.mcgill.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and embryo transfer by clinical touch alone. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with embryo transfer by clinical touch alone. SETTING: Infertility centers providing treatment with in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo transfer with or without transabdominal ultrasound guidance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. RESULT(S): A total of eight prospective controlled trials were identified. Of these studies, four were nonrandomized or quasi-randomized and four were genuinely randomized. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in all studies and in the genuinely randomized subgroup. The embryo implantation rate was also significantly increased following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. CONCLUSION(S): Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly increases the chance of clinical pregnancy and significantly increases the embryo implantation rate.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative efficacy of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and embryo transfer by clinical touch alone. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with embryo transfer by clinical touch alone. SETTING: Infertility centers providing treatment with in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S): Embryo transfer with or without transabdominal ultrasound guidance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate. RESULT(S): A total of eight prospective controlled trials were identified. Of these studies, four were nonrandomized or quasi-randomized and four were genuinely randomized. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly increased chance of clinical pregnancy following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in all studies and in the genuinely randomized subgroup. The embryo implantation rate was also significantly increased following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. CONCLUSION(S): Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer significantly increases the chance of clinical pregnancy and significantly increases the embryo implantation rate.
Authors: Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Karl R Hansen; Jennifer D Peck; R Matthew Coward; Robert A Wild; J C Trussell; Stephen A Krawetz; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 6.353
Authors: Kazem Nouri; Clemens B Tempfer; Katharina Walch; Regina Promberger; Sema Dag; Johannes Ott Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 5.211