Literature DB >> 14556800

Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection safe?

Matthew G Retzloff1, Mark D Hornstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the pregnancy and birth outcomes of patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
DESIGN: Selective review of the literature.
SETTING: Couples undergoing either conventional IVF or ICSI and their resulting offspring. PATIENT(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): None.
RESULTS: These observational studies are unfortunately inherently biased. Regardless, the information and experiences from these large centers cannot be ignored. These experiences reveal that birth weight may be decreased by an amount that is generally not clinically relevant. Chromosomal and genetic abnormalities are increased probably only as a direct corollary to the underlying parental risk. Congenital malformations reveal no clustering of any single specific abnormality. Developmental assessment is available for up to 2 years, and no major delays have been identified in either motor or mental function. CONCLUSION(S): Intracytoplasmic sperm injection appears to be a safe alternative for couples who otherwise would be unable to achieve pregnancy. The inherent risks associated with these genetically "at risk" couples mandate thorough evaluation and counseling before undertaking ICSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14556800     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01014-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Are children born from singleton pregnancies conceived by ICSI at increased risk for congenital malformations when compared to children conceived naturally? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Lacamara; Carolina Ortega; Sonia Villa; Ricardo Pommer; Juan Enrique Schwarze
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology?

Authors:  Greene Donald Royster; Kavitha Krishnamoorthy; John M Csokmay; Belinda J Yauger; Rebecca J Chason; Alan H DeCherney; Erin F Wolff; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortion after assisted reproductive treatment.

Authors:  Ji Won Kim; Woo Sik Lee; Tae Ki Yoon; Hyun Ha Seok; Jung Hyun Cho; You Shin Kim; Sang Woo Lyu; Sung Han Shim
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.103

4.  The impact of supraphysiologic serum estradiol levels on peri-implantation embryo development and early pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Anthony N Imudia; Randi H Goldman; Awoniyi O Awonuga; Diane L Wright; Aaron K Styer; Thomas L Toth
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Aneuploidy in abortuses following IVF and ICSI.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident on Assisted Reproductive Technology in Fukushima Prefecture: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Masako Hayashi; Keiya Fujimori; Seiji Yasumura; Akihito Nakai
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-07-27

7.  Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors of Congenital Anomalies: an Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Kyung Shin Lee; Yoon Jung Choi; Jinwoo Cho; Hyunji Lee; Heejin Lee; Soo Jin Park; Joong Shin Park; Yun Chul Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  High quality sperm for nonhuman primate ART: production and assessment.

Authors:  Catherine A VandeVoort
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.