Literature DB >> 14555621

Simple stochastic birth and death models of genome evolution: was there enough time for us to evolve?

Georgy P Karev1, Yuri I Wolf, Eugene V Koonin.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The distributions of many genome-associated quantities, including the membership of paralogous gene families can be approximated with power laws. We are interested in developing mathematical models of genome evolution that adequately account for the shape of these distributions and describe the evolutionary dynamics of their formation.
RESULTS: We show that simple stochastic models of genome evolution lead to power-law asymptotics of protein domain family size distribution. These models, called Birth, Death and Innovation Models (BDIM), represent a special class of balanced birth-and-death processes, in which domain duplication and deletion rates are asymptotically equal up to the second order. The simplest, linear BDIM shows an excellent fit to the observed distributions of domain family size in diverse prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. However, the stochastic version of the linear BDIM explored here predicts that the actual size of large paralogous families is reached on an unrealistically long timescale. We show that introduction of non-linearity, which might be interpreted as interaction of a particular order between individual family members, allows the model to achieve genome evolution rates that are much better compatible with the current estimates of the rates of individual duplication/loss events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555621     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  15 in total

1.  Scale-free networks versus evolutionary drift.

Authors:  Teresa M Przytycka; Yi-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Comput Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  A stochastic version of corticosteriod pharmacogenomic model.

Authors:  Xiaohong Qi
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Universal sharing patterns in proteomes and evolution of protein fold architecture and life.

Authors:  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés; Derek Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  A model for the evolution of paralog families in genomes.

Authors:  Ryszard Rudnicki; Jerzy Tiuryn; Damian Wójtowicz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Evolution of protein families: is it possible to distinguish between domains of life?

Authors:  Marta Sales-Pardo; Albert O B Chan; Luís A N Amaral; Roger Guimerà
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Rapid evolution of two odorant-binding protein genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.

Authors:  Takashi Matsuo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Short and long-term genome stability analysis of prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Matteo Brilli; Pietro Liò; Vincent Lacroix; Marie-France Sagot
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The ecology of bacterial genes and the survival of the new.

Authors:  M Pilar Francino
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-31

9.  Modelling prokaryote gene content.

Authors:  Matthew Spencer; Edward Susko; Andrew J Roger
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 1.625

10.  Universal features in the genome-level evolution of protein domains.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino; Alessandro L Sellerio; Philip D Heijning; Bruno Bassetti
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.