Literature DB >> 14555508

Reduced MLH1 expression after chemotherapy is an indicator for poor prognosis in esophageal cancers.

Kentaro Kishi1, Yuichiro Doki, Masahiko Yano, Takushi Yasuda, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara, Syuji Takiguchi, Sontae Kim, Ichiro Higuchi, Morito Monden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Loss of function or expression of the mismatch repair gene MLH1 has been implicated in experimentally acquired resistance to cisplatin (CDDP) and other anticancer agents. The clinical significance of MLH1 expression was evaluated in advanced thoracic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We investigated MLH1 and P53 expression by immunohistochemistry in the surgical specimens of 107 patients who had undergone preoperative chemotherapy using CDDP along with 5-FU and ADM. These findings were correlated with the clinical outcome for this treatment. Biopsy samples before chemotherapy in 20 of these patients, and another 43 surgical specimens without chemotherapy, were also examined as control samples.
RESULTS: In surgical specimens of ESCC, low MLH1 expression was not frequent without chemotherapy, whereas it was commonly observed after chemotherapy (14 versus 37%, P = 0.0057). Comparison between samples before and after chemotherapy revealed that MLH1 expression was unchanged during chemotherapy in 12 of 20 patients (60%) but was from high to low in 8 of 20 patients (40%). In the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, MLH1 expression was not correlated with any clinicopathological factors, including the response to chemotherapy. However, low MLH1 showed poorer prognosis than high MLH1 (5-year survival 40.6 versus 19.3%, P = 0.0393), and in multivariate analysis, MLH1 was an independent prognostic factor for this multimodal treatment, following lymph node metastasis and clinical response to chemotherapy. Positive p53 expression, which was not affected by chemotherapy, was weakly associated with a poor response and clinical outcome, although this trend was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In advanced ESCC, expression of MLH1 is reduced during CDDP-based chemotherapy, and this may partly account for poor postoperative survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14555508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

1.  Differences of onset age and survival rates in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases with and without family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer from a high-incidence area in North China.

Authors:  Denggui Wen; Shijie Wang; Liwei Zhang; Jianhui Zhang; Lizhen Wei; Xiuqing Zhao
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Current status of predictive biomarkers for neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Norihisa Uemura; Tadashi Kondo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  MLH1 expression predicts the response to preoperative therapy and is associated with PD-L1 expression in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Kota Momose; Makoto Yamasaki; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  MLH1 as a direct target of MiR-155 and a potential predictor of favorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Jing Liu; Yu-Pei Zhao; Tai-Ping Zhang; Li Zhou; Quan-Cai Cui; Wei-Xun Zhou; Lei You; Ge Chen; Hong Shu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Mismatch repair protein deficiency compromises cisplatin-induced apoptotic signaling.

Authors:  Ryan P Topping; John C Wilkinson; Karin Drotschmann Scarpinato
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced esophageal cancer evaluated by computed tomography predicts the utility of a second cycle of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Takushi Yasuda; Hiroshi Miyata; Yingfeng Peng; Makoto Yamasaki; Osamu Shiraishi; Koji Tanaka; Osamu Ishikawa; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11

7.  Integration of Principles of Systems Biology and Radiation Biology: Toward Development of in silico Models to Optimize IUdR-Mediated Radiosensitization of DNA Mismatch Repair Deficient (Damage Tolerant) Human Cancers.

Authors:  Timothy J Kinsella; Evren Gurkan-Cavusoglu; Weinan Du; Kenneth A Loparo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  The miRacle in Pancreatic Cancer by miRNAs: Tiny Angels or Devils in Disease Progression.

Authors:  Zuhair Hawa; Inamul Haque; Arnab Ghosh; Snigdha Banerjee; LaCoiya Harris; Sushanta K Banerjee
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  MLH1 mediates PARP-dependent cell death in response to the methylating agent N-methyl-N-nitrosourea.

Authors:  J R McDaid; J Loughery; P Dunne; J C Boyer; C S Downes; R A Farber; C P Walsh
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Expression of DNA translesion synthesis polymerase η in head and neck squamous cell cancer predicts resistance to gemcitabine and cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wendi Zhou; Yih-wen Chen; Xiyong Liu; Peiguo Chu; Sofia Loria; Yafan Wang; Yun Yen; Kai-Ming Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.